Screen Shot 2018-03-13 at 11.09.58 AMW:



Conducting joint investigations and joint enforcement actions with foreign authorities may become a new norm.


On December 22, 2017, Keppel Offshore & Marine (KOM) and its wholly owned US-based subsidiary signed agreements with US authorities that resulted in the payment of approximately US$422 million of penalties for violations of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). This is the seventh-largest FCPA settlement ever and the first of its kind for a major Singaporean company.

This case sent shockwaves through Singapore, as KOM is partly owned by the Singapore government. What lessons does it hold for Singaporean companies?

The quick answer: This is yet another signal the Singaporean authorities will take increasingly firm action against wrongdoing even if it may adversely affect “brand Singapore”. In the KOM matter, the Singaporean authorities issued a “conditional warning” to KOM and, in exchange, KOM paid almost US$53 million to Singapore as part of the US global settlement. This is unprecedented and potentially controversial, given that Singapore has never put in place a formal deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) regime and had no prior practice of entering into such DPAs.

Despite the lack of precedent, Singaporean authorities had no qualms entering uncharted territory to ensure justice was achieved. This follows in the wake of the 1MDB saga, where the authorities also used less conventional charges and relatively large regulatory fines to penalise banks and bankers for misconduct in that matter, another first of its kind. An earlier sign of increased regulatory action was the ST Marine case involving executives implicated in the giving of more than S$24 million of bribes to its customers to obtain more work, some of whom are based overseas. These cases show that Singaporean authorities will act firmly against Singaporeans, even if wrongdoing occurs outside its shores.

The global settlement reached in the KOM case is particularly noteworthy because it marks the first time that Singaporean authorities have collaborated with a foreign authority to reach a shared agreement with an offender. Though uncommon in Singapore, such a practice has been adopted by many other countries such as the US, Switzerland and the UK. This could mean that Singapore may conduct more joint investigations with other foreign authorities and enter into similar agreements in the future.

Another factor to consider is Singapore’s position as a significant financial centre and the fact that offenders often attempt to stash their illicit funds in the country. This could potentially mean more international cooperation and prosecutions are on the horizon.

In view of the above, joint investigations and joint enforcement actions may be a new norm. Singaporean companies must be especially wary of falling afoul of laws with extraterritorial effect, such as the Prevention of Corruption Act. What then should companies proactively do now and what options might they consider if they encounter such issues?

1. Put in place a strong compliance framework. This not only helps prevent wrongdoing, it shows regulators that adequate efforts have been taken to prevent wrongdoing.

2. Consider, when appropriate, self-reporting. In the KOM matter, the Singaporean authorities expressly stated that “due consideration was given to the substantial cooperation… and the extensive remedial measures” undertaken by KOM. Reference was made to the fact that the matter was self-reported. These were also positive points cited by the US authorities in reducing the quantum of penalties imposed.

3. Support your decisions with independent internal investigations. Cooperation and self-remediation are only possible if prompt internal investigations are conducted so that decisions are made with as much relevant information as possible. Such investigations should, as far as possible, be independent as this will help show that remedial actions are fact-based and genuine in nature.

Kroll Logo





By Chin Yong Kwek, Kroll Associate Managing Director



Related Articles by Firm
Physical security key to data centre protection
Controls that prevent physical access to servers must be a fundamental component of any information security programme ...
Combating private sector corruption in Indonesia: A challenge to address in 2019
With elections just around the corner, corruption involving government and public service agencies will likely be a top issue ...
Infrastructure investment in emerging markets — mitigating the risks
Infrastructure projects in emerging markets attract investors on the back of potential returns that can outstrip yields in mature markets ...
Defeatist data security cultures no more
Organisations need to recognise that information security is a question of risk and step up defences now ..
Innovating internal investigations in today’s hyperconnected world
Data visualisation tools have emerged as a powerful resource for internal investigations ...
Why asset searches are increasing in Singapore
Parties choose to resolve their disputes in Singapore for the relative ease of enforcement of awards and judgments.
New ultimate beneficial ownership disclosure requirements: An important step in combating financial crime in Indonesia
The requirement will strengthen and amplify the anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, anti-tax avoidance/evasion and anti-monopolism efforts.
Kroll: Opaque ownership fastest-growing concern for compliance professionals
Less than 25 percent feel highly confident in their program’s ability to address these risks.
Global Fraud & Risk Report – 2017/18
Forging New Paths in Times of Uncertainty ...
Law firms play a critical role in the new Indian Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code
Many new reforms and regulations have been introduced to support economic growth. However, one area that was always neglected was bankruptcy law ...
Risks for investors ahead of 2018 Malaysia elections
Investors should be aware of elevated fraud and corruption risks in the lead-up to the election ...
Forensic accounting to assist asset search
There are endless ways to identify assets, but it can be a costly exercise ...
Buyer, beware!
The final of four reports from Kroll and Liberty Asia on how to mitigate any hidden compliance and reputational risks relating to human trafficking issues …
Forewarned is forearmed
The third of four reports from Kroll and Liberty Asia on how to mitigate any hidden compliance and reputational risks relating to human trafficking issues …
Crime vs. Ethics: Changing corporate culture to reduce modern slavery
The second of four reports from Kroll and Liberty Asia on how to mitigate any hidden compliance and reputational risks relating to human trafficking issues …
Reducing and removing involvement in modern slavery
The first of four reports from Kroll and Liberty Asia on how to mitigate any hidden compliance and reputational risks relating to human trafficking issues ...
Related Articles
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
Dispute Resolution Special Report
In this month’s Special Report on dispute resolution, we take a look at how Asia Pacific’s role as an international centre for dispute resolution, particularly arbitration, has grown against a backdrop of increasing cross-border transactions. As demand has ...
Latest Articles