Indonesia

Screen Shot 2019-02-01 at 10.57.38 PM

 

 

 

 

 

With national elections in Indonesia just around the corner, corruption involving government and public service agencies will likely be a top issue for political contenders and voters alike. Indeed, results of a survey conducted in August 2018 by the Indonesia Survey Institute (LSI) indicated that corruption is a major concern for Indonesians.

However, Minister for National Development Planning Bambang Brodjonegoro has also stated that approximately 80 percent of corruption cases in Indonesia involve the private sector. Because the private sector drives an immense part of the country’s economy, addressing this problem takes on great urgency.

Government leaders have made some strides in the fight against private sector corruption. The Indonesian Supreme Court has provided clear guidance under Supreme Court Regulation number 13 of 2016, which was specifically enacted to combat corporate crime. In evaluating corporate culpability, the Regulation looks at whether the corporation:

▪ obtained any benefit from the crime or whether the crime was committed for the interest of the corporation;
▪ acquiesced to the crime; or
▪ took the necessary steps to prevent or mitigate adverse effects and ensure compliance with the law to prevent a crime.

Persons and corporations in the private sector are also liable for prosecution under the Indonesian Anticorruption Law Number 31 of 1999, which was amended into Law Number 20 of 2001 and states that the subject of corruption prosecution could be both an individual and a corporation if it is related to the public sector.

Additionally, Indonesia has fully ratified the UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) into Law Number 7 of 2006. Among the UNCAC provisions is guidance on “many different forms of corruption, such as bribery, trading in influence, abuse of functions, and various acts of corruption in the private sector”.

CHALLENGES
Translating word and intention into deed has proved challenging. At this time, almost 24 percent of suspected public corruption cases under investigation by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) involve persons and corporations from the private sector. But while the KPK gets strong approval ratings from Indonesian citizens (eg, 86 percent of respondents to the 2017 poll by Saiful Mujani Research and Consulting said they trust the KPK), KPK’s work is often undermined by inadequate funding, political detractors and even physical attacks on commissioners. As recently as January 9 this year, bombs were found at the homes of the commission’s chairman, Agus Rahardjo, and deputy chairman, Laode Muhammad Syarif.

Further, while Indonesia’s ranking in Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index for 2017, which measures the perceived levels of public sector corruption worldwide, has improved compared to five years ago, Indonesia still has a score of only 37, and with the scale running from 100 (very clean) to 0 (highly corrupt), the country has a corruption problem on its hands. Moreover, as noted in the media, Indonesia’s scores could be putting the country at a competitive disadvantage when compared with those of neighbouring countries such as Malaysia (with a score of 47), Brunei (62) and Singapore (84).

Based on Kroll’s decades of experience in anti-corruption investigations, there are some strategic best practices that the government can put into practice that have proved effective elsewhere in helping prevent and/or detect private sector corruption:

1. Mandate the declaration of all beneficial owners;
2. Criminalise conflict of interest;
3. Manage gift giving;
4. Encourage cashless transactions;
5. Require that accounting systems must record all transactions accurately and completely;
6. Require companies to maintain and archive supporting documents or data of all transactions;
7. Criminalise any off-the-books accounts hiding bribery;
8. Conduct proper and deep due diligence; contractually reserve the right to audit third parties; and
9. Obligate all companies to establish and maintain a risk-based anti-bribery management systems.

Common belief holds that many private corporations will not remain silent about cases of corruption as it will adversely impact their businesses. However, the government should exercise its legitimate power mandated by the people for a better Indonesia by taking immediate action to more rigorously combat and prosecute private sector corruption.

 

By Budi Santoso, Senior Director, Business Intelligence & Investigations, Kroll
E: budi.santoso@kroll.com
W: www.kroll.com

_________________________


Screen Shot 2019-02-01 at 11.05.31 PMKroll is the leading global provider of risk solutions with more than 45 years of experience in helping clients make confident risk management decisions about people, assets, operations and security. For more information, visit www.kroll.com
.

 

Official Publication: Asian-mena CounselClick Here to read the full issue of Asian-mena Couddnsel: Projects & Energy Special Report 2019. 

Related Articles by Firm
Physical security key to data centre protection
Controls that prevent physical access to servers must be a fundamental component of any information security programme ...
Infrastructure investment in emerging markets — mitigating the risks
Infrastructure projects in emerging markets attract investors on the back of potential returns that can outstrip yields in mature markets ...
Defeatist data security cultures no more
Organisations need to recognise that information security is a question of risk and step up defences now ..
Innovating internal investigations in today’s hyperconnected world
Data visualisation tools have emerged as a powerful resource for internal investigations ...
Why asset searches are increasing in Singapore
Parties choose to resolve their disputes in Singapore for the relative ease of enforcement of awards and judgments.
New ultimate beneficial ownership disclosure requirements: An important step in combating financial crime in Indonesia
The requirement will strengthen and amplify the anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, anti-tax avoidance/evasion and anti-monopolism efforts.
Kroll: Opaque ownership fastest-growing concern for compliance professionals
Less than 25 percent feel highly confident in their program’s ability to address these risks.
Singapore gets serious in fight against bribery and corruption
Conducting joint investigations and joint enforcement actions with foreign authorities may become a new norm ...
Global Fraud & Risk Report – 2017/18
Forging New Paths in Times of Uncertainty ...
Law firms play a critical role in the new Indian Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code
Many new reforms and regulations have been introduced to support economic growth. However, one area that was always neglected was bankruptcy law ...
Risks for investors ahead of 2018 Malaysia elections
Investors should be aware of elevated fraud and corruption risks in the lead-up to the election ...
Forensic accounting to assist asset search
There are endless ways to identify assets, but it can be a costly exercise ...
Buyer, beware!
The final of four reports from Kroll and Liberty Asia on how to mitigate any hidden compliance and reputational risks relating to human trafficking issues …
Forewarned is forearmed
The third of four reports from Kroll and Liberty Asia on how to mitigate any hidden compliance and reputational risks relating to human trafficking issues …
Crime vs. Ethics: Changing corporate culture to reduce modern slavery
The second of four reports from Kroll and Liberty Asia on how to mitigate any hidden compliance and reputational risks relating to human trafficking issues …
Reducing and removing involvement in modern slavery
The first of four reports from Kroll and Liberty Asia on how to mitigate any hidden compliance and reputational risks relating to human trafficking issues ...
Related Articles
Ministerial Regulation removing back office services from the Foreign Business Operations Act announced
Certain back office service businesses will no longer require a foreign business licence.
Changes are coming!
Five factors to consider when reviewing your Canadian trademark strategy in 2019.
Forensic investigations, the role of corporate counsel and the rise of information governance
Head of Forensics – Erick Gunawan, discusses the Role of Corporate Counsel in the context of litigation or investigation and the increasing importance of information governance ...
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
New Manpower Regulation Eliminates Controversial Work Permit Requirements in Indonesia
Indonesia eases requirements for work permits of expatriates working in the country.
Update: Guide to Background Checks in Indonesia
Background checks on employees are not expressly regulated by Indonesian employment laws but certain background checks are subject to the applicant or employee's consent.
Latest Articles
Ministerial Regulation removing back office services from the Foreign Business Operations Act announced
Certain back office service businesses will no longer require a foreign business licence.
Changes are coming!
Five factors to consider when reviewing your Canadian trademark strategy in 2019.
Herbies goes to Shanghai FTZ
Herbert Smith Freehills is adding local law capabilities in China through a joint operation with Kewei Law Firm.