Singapore

By Abraham Vergis, Asiyah Arif & Niki Chen, Providence Law Asia
abraham@providencelawasia.com  asiyah@providencelawasia.com  nawaz@providencelawasia.com

On 1 January 2017, the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (“SIAC”) introduced a specialized set of arbitral rules targeted directly at investment disputes.

With the introduction of the Investment Arbitration Rules 2017 (the “IA Rules”), the SIAC is now the first private arbitral institution to cater separately to investment and commercial arbitrations, distinguishing itself from other contemporary arbitral institutions.

The IA Rules are, in a large part, based on the SIAC Rules 2016. However, it includes a number of innovations and modifications designed specifically for investment arbitration. We highlight the key differences below:

I. Appointment of arbitrator(s)

The nomination and appointment of arbitrators under SIAC Rules 2016 operates largely on parties’ consent. Thus, this can be a long drawn process. In the IA Rules, to expedite matters, the Court of Arbitration of SIAC is empowered to appoint arbitrators for the parties if they fail to do so within the prescribed period [Rule 8].

To streamline the appointment process further, the IA Rules has introduced a default procedure for the appointment of the presiding arbitrator with strict (and relatively short) timelines to be complied with [Rule 8].

II. Appointment of emergency arbitrator

Under the IA Rules, the parties can apply for emergency arbitration only if both parties have expressly agreed for the emergency arbitration provisions in the IA Rules to apply [Rule 27.4, Schedule 1].

III. Third Party Submissions

Parties to the underlying contract who are not participants to the arbitration may request to make submissions to the Tribunal. The Tribunal may also invite written submissions from non-disputing contracting parties [Rule 29].

For matters that directly concern the dispute, the non-disputing contracting parties must have the Tribunal’s consent prior to making submissions. The Tribunal will consider the helpfulness and relevance of the submissions, the non- disputing parties’ interest in the matter, and whether disputing parties’ confidentiality will be violated [Rules 29.2 and 29.3].

IV. Third Party Funding Issues

The Tribunal can order the disclosure of third-party funding arrangements [Rule 24(l)], and to take such arrangements into account when approaching costs [Rule 33].

V. Confidentiality

Once parties have agreed to use the IA Rules, the parties shall be deemed to have allowed SIAC to publish information on proceedings. These are limited to nationalities of the parties, identities of the tribunal members, the treaty or other legal instrument under which the arbitration has been commenced, the date of commencement of the arbitration; and whether the proceedings are ongoing or have been terminated [Rule 38].

VI. Conclusion

The IA Rules will only be applicable to a dispute where the contracting parties have expressly
agreed to this, and it is foreseeable that the IA Rules may also be provided for in future investment treaties.

The robust rules will serve to strengthen SIAC’s reputation as a leading international arbitration centre and attract further bilateral and multilateral investment arbitration disputes to be resolved in Singapore.
If you would like information on this area of law, please contact:

Abraham VERGIS
Managing Director
+65 6438 1969
abraham@providencelawasia.com

Asiyah ARIF
Counsel
+65 6438 1969
asiyah@providencelawasia.com

You can also download this update as a PDF below.

This update is for your general information only. It is not intended to be nor should it be regarded as legal advice.

Tags: arbitration, Disputes, Investment, Singapore
Related Articles by Firm
Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd v Samsung C&T Corp [2018] SGCA 39
– Principles Governing Adjudication of Claims under the SOPA ...
Tay Wee Kiat and another v Public Prosecutor and another appeal [2018] SGHC 114 and the Criminal Justice Reform Act 2018 – Implications for criminal compensation orders
Recent changes evidence a gradual paradigm shift in recognising that criminal law is not just about the public interest, but also the interests of victims.
The Singapore International Commercial Court considers the quantification of the Close-Out Amount under the ISDA Master Agreement
The decision provides clarification on how the Close-Out Amount under Clause 14 of the ISDA Master Agreement is to be calculated.
Liability of directors for a company’s breach of contract
The question of when a director may be held liable for directing a company’s breach of contract has significant ramifications for companies and their directors.
Guidelines on cost awards for SICC cases
The Singapore International Commercial Court passed a significant ruling in CPIT Investments v Qilin World Capital.
Legitimate discount or undervalue transaction?
Parakou Investment Holdings Pte Ltd and another v Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd (in liquidation) and other appeals [2018] 1 SLR 271 ...
Singapore: Deferred prosecution agreements
The Singapore government is looking to introduce deferred prosecution agreements as part of a slew of proposed changes to the Criminal Procedure Code.
Singapore: Vicarious Liability and Insurers
The Decision in Ong Han Ling v American International Assurance Co Ltd ...
Singapore: Recent Developments in Trade Mark Enforcement
In recent times, Singapore’s undisputed position as a global leader in shipping and intellectual property has come under substantial challenge ...
Singapore: CIFG Special Assets Capital I Ltd (formerly known as Diamond Kendall Ltd) v Ong Puay Koon and others and another appeal [2017] SGCA 70
The central issue in the appeal was whether CIFG could claim the entirety of its losses against each of the Initial Shareholders jointly and severally.
The Assistant Registrar’s Role in the Judicial Hierarchy
The decision in Peter Low LLC provides the latest judicial pronouncement on the role and position of an Assistant Registrar in the judicial hierarchy ...
Singapore High Court issues guidance on grant of super priority
On 8 November 2017, in Re Attilan Group Ltd [2017] SGHC 283 (“Re Attilan”), the Singapore High Court took its first steps towards building a corpus of jurisprudence on the grant of super priority ...
The Future of Med-Arb Clauses in Singapore
Multi-tiered or escalation Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) clauses have gained increased popularity amongst parties seeking a flexible resolution process ...
Recent Developments in Patent Law
Sun Electric Pte Ltd v Sunseap Group Pte Ltd and others ...
Mauritian Company Successfully Enforces US$300 million LCIA Award in India
On 6 July 2012, Mauritius-based Cruz City Mauritius Holdings obtained a US$300 million award rendered by a London Court of International Arbitration tribunal. Cruz City thereafter sought to enforce this award in the High Court of New Delhi against its joint venture ...
Recent Significant Developments to Third-Party Funding in Singapore’s Arbitration Landscape
Third-party funding is increasingly prevalent globally in both litigation and arbitration ...
Recent Significant Changes to the Corporate Regulatory and Restructuring Regime in Singapore
In an effort to ensure Singapore’s corporate regulatory regime continues to stay robust and to strengthen Singapore’s status as a leading global financial hub, the Companies (Amendment) Act 2017 (“CAA 2017”) was passed by Parliament on 10 March 2017 ...
Related Articles
The New Normal: An interview with LOD’s head of innovation and design
We speak with Anthony Wright about the development of lexvoco, joining forces with LOD and the future of legal in Asia.
Don’t suffer FOMO* for Southeast Asia LegalTech!
Avoid the 'fear of missing out' by embracing the incredible opportunities technology offers.
Regulating the sale and provision of digital content through mobile cellular networks
The regulation is becoming more relevant as investors are increasingly interested in the digital content market.
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
Shooting the breeze
Asian-Counsel sits down with Carlo van den Akker, General Counsel for Asia with NXP Semiconductors Singapore Pty Ltd, to discuss everything from hidden microphones and toasting moutai to why, when it comes to obtaining legal services, ...
Forensic investigations, the role of corporate counsel and the rise of information governance
Head of Forensics – Erick Gunawan, discusses the Role of Corporate Counsel in the context of litigation or investigation and the increasing importance of information governance ...
Dispute Resolution Special Report
In this month’s Special Report on dispute resolution, we take a look at how Asia Pacific’s role as an international centre for dispute resolution, particularly arbitration, has grown against a backdrop of increasing cross-border transactions. As demand has ...
Latest Articles
The New Normal: An interview with LOD’s head of innovation and design
We speak with Anthony Wright about the development of lexvoco, joining forces with LOD and the future of legal in Asia.
Don’t suffer FOMO* for Southeast Asia LegalTech!
Avoid the 'fear of missing out' by embracing the incredible opportunities technology offers.
Blown away by the IBA
Patrick Dransfield describes his experience as a speaker and delegate at this year's IBA conference in Seoul.