India

The Indian trademarks law recognises both statutory as well as common law remedy to protect the rights of the proprietor of a trade mark. However, it is well-known that registration of trade mark has always been emphasised upon on account of the fundamental principle that “registration is prima facie evidence of validity and facilitates proof of title by a plaintiff suing for infringement of his/her trade marks” [National Bell Company v. Metal Goods Manufacturing Company private Limited, AIR 1971 SC 898].

While the presumption of validity of a registered trade mark has been widely deemed absolute and relied upon in several infringement proceedings, especially at the stage of interim injunction, there have also been judgments wherein the courts in infringement proceedings have deviated from the said presumption and delved into ascertaining the validly of registration at the interlocutory stage itself. It is on account of these conflicting judgments that a reference was made to a full bench of the Bombay High Court to clarify whether a court of law could examine the validity of registration of the plaintiff’s trade mark at the stage of deciding an application for interim injunction.

A full bench of Bombay High Court, while deciding the reference in “Lupin Ltd. v. Johnson and Johnson (Notice of Motion (L) No. 2178 of 2012 in Suit (L) No. 1842 of 2012) along with Shakti Bhog Foods Limited v. Parle Products Private Limited (Appeal (L) No. 674 of 2012)”, has held that while there exists a very strong presumption in law as to the validity of the registration of the trade mark, the courts are not powerless to refuse to grant an interlocutory injunction based on a plaintiff’s registered trade mark in exceptional circumstances when the registration of trade mark itself is ex facie illegal, fraudulent or shocks the conscience of the court.

Therefore, a court can delve into the question of validity of registration of plaintiff’s trade mark for this limited purpose to arrive at a prima facie finding when the defendant raises the plea of invalidity of registration at the interim stage. However, the Bombay High Court also emphasised and cautioned that such discretion can be exercised by the court only upon a very high threshold of prima facie proof being submitted before the court establishing the ex facie illegality or fraud involved in securing the registration from the Trade Marks Registry.

In concluding so, the Bombay High Court looked at the legislative intent behind the phrases “if valid” in Section 28 (which provides that registration if valid shall entitle proprietor of a registered trade mark to exclusive use of the same and obtain relief in case of infringement) and “prima facie evidence” in Section 31 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (which provides that registration is to be prima facie evidence of validity). It observed that these phrases have been explicitly provided to indicate that the presumption of validity is a rebuttable one and the defendant in an action for infringement may question the validity of plaintiff’s trade mark registration.

One of the instances of registration which may be deemed to be ex facie illegal or fraud would be grant of registration to the word ‘glucose’, which was held by the Apex Court in Corn Products Refining Co. v. Shangrila Food Products Ltd, AIR 1960 SC 142 to be a publici juris word over which no individual can assert exclusive rights.

The Bombay High Court further observed that the object of granting registration under the law, i.e. obviating the necessity of proving title to the mark in each and every case, is still achieved by the very creation of a strong presumption in law as to the validity of trade mark registration and placing a burden on the defendant to rebut the strong presumption of validity at the interlocutory stage. Furthermore, the jurisdiction to give a final and conclusive finding as to the validity of registration still remains intact with the IPAB through appropriate rectification proceedings instituted by the party challenging the registration. The court, having made only a prima facie finding with regard to the validity at the interlocutory stage, would still be bound by the conclusive finding of the IPAB in the rectification proceedings, if any.

Clasis Law
Dr Gopal Das Bhawan
14th Floor, 28, Barakhamba Road
New Delhi 110 001, INDIA
Tel: (91) 11 4213 0000
Fax: (91) 11 4213 0099
Email: rahul.beruar@clasislaw.com
sarita.rout@clasislaw.com
Website: www.clasislaw.com

Related Articles by Firm
Radical changes in the Foreign Direct Investment regime
INDIA- It is observed that India has the potential to attract even more foreign investment which could be achieved by liberalising ...
Mare Maritime Singapore Pte Ltd Vs. M.T. Everrich 8 [Notice of Motion (L) No. 2418 of 2015 in Admiralty Suit No. 854 of 2015]
Background: The owners of EVERRICH 8 (the Vessel), through their subsidiary Yuanland Ltd, entered into voyage charterparty with Rakha Al Khaleej International LLC ...
India's The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 makes major changes to the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996
The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance 2015 gives the necessary impetus for ease of conducting arbitration in India and enables speedy settlement of commercial disputes.
Multiple lenders = multiple stamping
On August 11, 2015 the division bench of the Supreme Court of India overturned a full bench decision of the Gujarat High Court in the matter of Coastal Gujarat Power Limited v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority....
Indian patent office revokes Hoffman-La Roche’s ‘Valganciclovir’ patent
The Controller of Patents (India) recently revoked the patent granted for the anti-retroviral drug ‘Valganciclovir’ used for treating active cytomegalovirus retinitis infection (CMV) ...
Urban reforms – three urban rejuvenation schemes launched
There is a compelling need to develop sustainable and technology-driven urban centres, partly as the burgeoning urban population is creating pressure on existing cities and partly to address the growing ...
Highlights of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015
The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015 (Amendment Act), which aims to amend the rigidities of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act), has ...
India - Projects, energy and infrastructure update
Including: Long-term infrastructure bonds;Smart cities mission and urban rejuvenation scheme; Railways to e-auction re-development of stations; New hybrid annuity model of PPP for the road sector; Shell set for global acquisition of BG; and IFC signs master co-operation agreement ...
The New Land Bill – ground reality
The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015 (2015 Bill) was …
Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill passed as ordinance in India
The long-awaited Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill (the Bill) has become a provisional law in India. The Bill, which could not be passed in Parliament in its winter session, was promulgated by the President …
Need for uniform stamp duty incidence across all States of India
‘Stamp Duty’ is a tax levied on an instrument by which any right or liability is, or purports to be created, transferred, limited, extended, extinguished or recorded …
‘Make in India’ campaign: Opportunities for investors
With a vision of leading the economy towards a path of high sustainable growth, the Prime Minister of India on September 25th, 2014 launched the ‘Make in India’ campaign. Through the …
Bumpy road ahead for vehicle manufacturers in India – pulled up by the competition watchdog
South Asian markets are one of the fastest growing markets for vehicle manufacturers worldwide. However, doing business in South Asia has its own challenges. The anti-monopoly watchdog of India …
Introduction of real estate investment trusts in India
The Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) in India have been in the news for some time. The World Bank1 describes REIT as a security sold to investors for the purpose of investing in real estate. REITs …
SC Larger Bench decision in case of Kone Elevators – distinction between ‘contracts of sale’ vis-a-vis ‘works contract’
The Constitutional Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court (SC), over-ruling the earlier decision of three-member Bench re State of A.P. v. Kone Elevators (India) Ltd1, has held that the activity of manufacturing, …
Companies Act, 2013 – implications for investors
One of the recent initiatives of the Indian Government towards ensuring sustainable economic growth and improving investment climate is enactment …
India Update, inc. Medical device controls
An overview of how and where regulatory controls apply to medical devices in India. Plus: key judgements passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court; changes in corporate and commercial matters; and case laws in indirect taxation.
Related Articles
The Greater China IP Updates – April 2022
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company continues to lead against its competitors in the IP field. Currently, the company is using its advanced 5-nanometer process in the commercial production of the A-series processors for Apple’s iPhone line. TSMC is also involved ...
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill passed as ordinance in India
The long-awaited Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill (the Bill) has become a provisional law in India. The Bill, which could not be passed in Parliament in its winter session, was promulgated by the President …
Urban reforms – three urban rejuvenation schemes launched
There is a compelling need to develop sustainable and technology-driven urban centres, partly as the burgeoning urban population is creating pressure on existing cities and partly to address the growing ...
India Update, inc. Medical device controls
An overview of how and where regulatory controls apply to medical devices in India. Plus: key judgements passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court; changes in corporate and commercial matters; and case laws in indirect taxation.
Latest Articles