Philippines

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.25.02 PMPublished in Asian-mena Counsel: Anti-Trust & Competition Special Report 2019

 

By Francisco Ed Lim, Eric R Recalde, Korina Ana T Manibog, ACCRALAW

 

For the first time since its inception in 2015, the Commission has blocked a merger after conducting its review.

 

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 4.42.53 PMIt is difficult to imagine that it has only been less than four years since the Philippine Competition Act (PCA) took effect in the Philippines after decades of being stuck in legislative limbo. The law came into effect on August 8, 2015, intended to enhance economic efficiency and promote free and fair competition, prevent economic concentration that will stifle competition, and penalise all forms of anti-competitive agreements, abuses of dominant position, and anti-competitive mergers and acquisitions, with the objective of protecting consumer welfare. It also established the main antitrust authority in the Philippines, the Philippine Competition Commission.

Despite the relatively short time since the law has taken effect, the Commission has made its presence known. The Commission has spared no effort in conducting information dissemination on the PCA, its implementing rules, and its programs to the public, through various fora, press releases, consultations, targeting not just conglomerates, but also small to medium enterprises, and other stakeholders. The Commission has also provided support to the Philippine Judicial Academy in terms of educating judges and court personnel about this fairly recent legal development.

The stakes are higher now for businesses and practitioners to educate themselves on the provisions of the law considering that some acts and agreements which they were doing prior to the enactment of the law may now raise red flags, and may potentially lead to hefty fines, and even imprisonment.

Since the lapse of the two-year curative period for companies to renegotiate agreements or restructure their businesses to comply with the provisions of the law last August 8, 2017, the Commission has become aggressive in carrying out its mandate under the law. In 2017, the Commission announced that it was conducting probes into the cement, power, garlic and health industries for potential anti-competitive acts. The Commission also indicated potential probes into the manufacturing, agricultural, and transport sectors.

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.16.35 PM

Later in the same year, the Commission started to open Phase II reviews of transactions which raise preliminary anticompetitive concerns. This is significant because when the Commission began conducting merger review, notified transactions were generally approved during the Phase I review. The Commission’s willingness to open Phase II reviews for transactions was a marked sign of its enhanced capability to spot actual or potential anticompetitive concerns during the course of its review in the relevant markets covered by the notified transactions.

Internally, the Commission also worked on streamlining the protocols and procedure to be followed for merger reviews and enforcement actions. The Commission released its rules of procedures on merger reviews, and enforcement against anti-competitive agreements and acts of abuse of dominant position, a move welcomed by practitioners and companies as it provided much needed structure in how merger reviews and enforcement actions are conducted.

In 2018, the Commission flagged competition concerns arising from the takeover of ride-hailing app Grab of its main rival in the Philippines, Uber, and conducted a motu propio review of the transaction. Before it could get clearance for the transaction, Grab had to agree to submit to voluntary commitments relating to quality and pricing standards in order to address the concerns raised by the Commission. Grab was also fined P16 million (US$310,000) for violating interim measures during the Commission’s review. The Commission has continued to monitor Grab’s compliance with the voluntary commitments. As recently as January of this year, Grab was fined once again for providing deficient, inconsistent, and incorrect data for the monitoring of its compliance with its commitments.

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.25.17 PM

Also in 2018, the Commission nullified the acquisition by Chelsea Logistics Holdings. of Trans-Asia Shipping Lines. and imposed a penalty of P22.8 million on the parties for failure to notify the Commission of the transaction. This was the first time the Commission exercised its power to nullify a transaction based on the parties’ failure to comply with the notification requirement under the PCA. The Commission also began fining parties for late filing of notification to the Commission, starting with AXA’s merger, through its subsidiary Camelot Holdings with the XL Group, with the latter surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of AXA. Since the parties notified beyond the 30-day period (but before consummation of the transaction), they were fined 0.5 percent of 1 percent of the value of the transaction or P123,861.86. Macsteel Global and MSSA Investments were also fined an amount of P526,219.50 for failure to notify within the prescribed notification period. In 2018 alone, fines for such gun-jumping violations amounted to P31.74 million.

The Commission has not spared government-owned and controlled corporations from being penalised. Earlier this year, the Commission fined the Bases Conversion and Development Authority, a government-owned and controlled corporation, and SM Prime Holdings. for failure to notify on time, with the fine amounting to P2 million.

The PCA authorises the Commission to adjust the notification thresholds from time to time. Pursuant to this authority, the Commission has made considerable adjustments to the merger notification thresholds in recent years. In 2018, it increased the size of party and size of transaction test, to P5 billion and P2 billion, respectively. The year after, the Commission further increased the thresholds to P5.6 billion and P2.2 billion, respectively. This was another move welcomed by many stakeholders as many were of the view that the initial P1 billion threshold was too small. Further, since the load of covered transactions subject to review has been lightened, the Commission can make more efficient use of its time and resources to better scrutinise those transactions covered by the new merger review thresholds.

The Commission also become more aggressive in its enforcement activities, opening eleven preliminary inquiries, nine of which ripened into full administrative investigations. The Commission has identified the following priority sectors to study or probe in 2019: rice, energy, fuel, logistics supply chain, corn milling and trading, refined petroleum manufacturing and trading, sugar, pesticides, baked products, and milk products.

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.16.46 PM

The year 2018 saw the release of various Commission issuances mainly related to merger reviews, such as those guidelines specific to joint ventures, non-coverage, and consolidation of ownership. In 2019, the Commission issued the Guidelines to Pre-Merger Exchanges of Information to regulate the exchange of confidential business information between notifying parties, prior to a merger or acquisition. The Commission is also currently working on updating its notification form template for notifiable mergers.

This year, for the first time since its inception, the Commission blocked a merger after conducting its review. The transaction was a proposed acquisition by the Universal Robina Corporation of the assets of Central Azucarera Don Pedro and Roxas Holdings, all engaged in the sugar milling industry. The transaction was disapproved as the Commission was of the view that allowing the transaction to push through would create a monopoly that would result in harming the welfare of sugar cane planters. Consider this in relation to the first two years of the law’s existence, wherein reviewed transactions were generally approved. The Commission has truly started to bare its teeth.

Another first for the Commission was the filing of a case by the Commission’s Enforcement Office against a mass housing developer for abuse of dominant position by engaging in an exclusive internet service tie-up on its property. In the early years of the Commission’s existence, it was more focused on merger reviews. This case demonstrates that it is ready to be more active in cracking down on cartels and those companies that abuse their dominant position.

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.25.48 PM

The Commission has also ramped up its efforts coordinating with other regulatory agencies and government arms. Currently, the Commission has entered into memoranda of agreement with the Office of the Solicitor General, Securities and Exchange Commission, Commission on Audit, Philippine Statistics Authority, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, Insurance Commission, Office of the Ombudsman, Department of Justice, Public-Private Partnership Centre, Integrated Bar of the Philippines, University of the Philippines College of Law, and the Department of Trade and Industry. These memoranda will greatly aid the Commission in its efforts to establish itself as the main authority on all matters related to competition, and may facilitate the Commission in its information gathering efforts in relation to their investigations and reviews of mergers and acquisitions.

Expect closer coordination between the Commission and the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission moving forward. The Revised Corporation Code, which came effect recently, has included provisions which acknowledge or require the Commission’s inputs for certain matters. In particular, the Code acknowledges that the Commission may prescribe additional qualifications for directors or trustees. The Code also recognises that increases or decreases in authorised capital stock, and the sale or disposition of assets may also be subject to the Commission’s approval. The Code also allows the legislature to set maximum limits on stock ownership whenever necessary to prevent anti-competitive practices as provided in the PCA.

Interestingly, the Commission has clashed with another government agencies in the exercise of its mandate. In an amicus curiae filed with the Supreme Court, the Commission expressed its discontent over a provision in the implementing rules and regulations of the Contractor’s Licence Law which allows the Philippine Contractors Accreditation Board to licence local contractors on a yearly basis, while requiring foreign contractors to obtain a new licence per project. For the Commission, this constitutes unfair competition as it creates a barrier to the entry of new players, and thus should be nullified. The Commission has also expressed conflicting views with the Energy Regulatory Commission on who has jurisdiction to resolve cases of competition concerns in the energy sector. The Energy Regulatory Commission insists it has jurisdiction as provided under the Electric Power Industry Reform Act of 2001. However, the Commission is contesting this position, asserting its primary authority over all competition matters, even those in the energy sector. A case is currently pending in the Supreme Court, the decision of which is expected to resolve the issue.

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.16.56 PM

The Commission continues to charge ahead. In January of this year, the Commission launched a leniency and whistleblower programme for cartel members, offering immunity from suit and reduction of penalties to cartel members who provide information that may aid the Commission in its investigations. The Commission recently expressed its intention to check allegations of collusion among power plant operators amidst recent outages in the Philippines that may have contributed to price increases in the retail electricity market. It also just recently announced its plans to form a task force that will look into previously-approved mergers and acquisitions. The Commission is also conducting public consultations on its proposed expedited merger review procedure for certain covered transactions.

Companies are slowly learning to live in a world where the Philippine Competition Act exists. They are more careful in entering into agreements and in engaging in activities that may be construed as a violation of the law. Industry and trade associations have also adjusted their rules of interaction lest they be subject to investigation by the Commission. Others, particularly those with frequent acquisitions, are becoming more adept in preparing notifications to the Commission.

Considering the rapid development of competition law in the Philippines, fuelled by the Commission’s efforts to evolve and to build its capability to better carry out its mandate, practitioners must ensure that they are able to keep abreast of all the developments occurring in this field in order to keep up. As many businesses in the Philippines still remain unfamiliar with competition law, they rely heavily on lawyers to guide them navigate the complexities of the Philippine Competition Act. Failure by practitioners to update themselves on advances in this field may prove detrimental and costly to their clients. The state of competition law in the Philippines will continue to grow, and practitioners must grow alongside it.

 

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.23.34 PM

W: accralaw.com

E: felim@accralaw.com
E: errecalde@accralaw.com
E: ktmanibog@accralaw.com

 

Official Publication: Asian-mena CounselClick Here to read the full issue of Asian-mena Counsel: Anti-Trust & Competition Special Report 2019. 

Related Articles by Firm
Developments in the Philippine Competition Commission’s enforcement activities
Early this year, the Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) Enforcement Office launched a leniency/whistleblower programme offering immunity from suit and reduction of fines to cartel members who will provide information that will help the PCC investigate and prosecute cartels ...
Revisiting the AMLA in light of transnational money laundering
For several decades, money laundering has extended the reach of transnational organised crime throughout various nations ...
Revisiting important concepts in arbitration
Philippine courts are keen on making arbitration and other modes of ADR the staple in settling disputes domestically.
Keeping your mobile number for a lifetime
A new law facilitates the easy movement of subscribers from one service provider to another.
The right to know: Freedom of information in the Supreme Court
Like all other rights, the “right to know” is not an absolute right.
The Philippines 11th Foreign Investment Negative List and its impact on online businesses
A more liberalised foreign participation may change the internet-based business landscape in the Philippines ...
A peek into the revised Corporation Code of the Philippines
On February 20, 2019, President Rodrigo Duterte signed into law Republic Act No. 11232, otherwise known as the Revised Corporation Code of the Philippines (the New Code) ...
Philippines: Protecting indigenous knowledge systems and practices in intellectual property rights registration
Indigenous peoples (IPs) and indigenous cultural communities (ICCs), though explicitly protected under the constitution itself, sadly remain one of the most marginalised and forgotten sectors in Philippine society ...
Philippines: The right to know – Freedom of information in the Supreme Court
Freedom of Information is a right enshrined in our fundamental law ...
Investments for the environment
In a recent report released by the leading international body for assessment of climate change, the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (UN IPCC), established a target global warming limit of 1.5°C ...
The PCC’s Joint Venture Guidelines
The Philippine Competition Commission must strive to strike a balance ...
How the Mental Health Act affects employees
Mental health conditions, which include anxiety and panic disorders, depression, eating disorders, substance abuse and addictions, have become a pervasive issue which permeates our present society ...
The Ease of Doing Business Act tapers red tape
RA 11032 is a welcome step towards achieving the quality government services that Filipinos deserve.
Much EndO about nothing
President Duterte says he has put an end to the “Endo” or the practice of engaging employees on a contractual basis. But has he?
Philippines: Proposed rules and regulations on crowdfunding
Crowdfunding (CF) platforms have proven to be a popular way to solicit charitable donations and to raise funds for projects or business ventures ...
Virtual currency in the Philippines: Recognition and regulation
Bitcoin is essentially a virtual currency (VC), which is any type of digital unit that is used as a medium of exchange — a veritable currency that exists in the digital world. Since it is electronic currency, VC is easily transferable ...
Protection of women employees in the Philippines
According to the World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap (GGG) Report conducted in 2016, the Philippines is the most gender-equal country in the Asia-Pacific region, having closed nearly 79 percent of its gender gap ...
Anti-Trust & Competition: Philippines - Towards robust yet balanced competition in the Philippines
The state of Philippine competition regulation has been slowly taking shape barely over two years after the passage of the Philippine Competition Act (RA 10667) ...
PHILIPPINES: The internet and doing business in the Philippines
Earlier this year, the Philippines Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued an opinion stating that an online gaming system with absolutely no physical presence in the Philippines shall be considered as “doing business” in the Philippines and was thus required ...
Philippines: Psychological disorders in the workplace
The problem of mental health presents a particular conundrum under labour relations and standards ...
Clarifying the role of contractors and subcontractors
Recent changes to labour laws in the Philippines attempt to clarify the status of contractors and subcontractors in certain industries ...
Fake news and its web of legal issues in the post-truth era
Oxford Dictionaries’ Word of the Year for 2016 is “post-truth” — an adjective defined as “relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief”. ...
Dollar-denominated securities in relation to Corporation Code’s provisions on capital
The Philippines Stock Exchange (PSE) issued rules on December 2, 2016 governing the listing, trading and settlement of US dollar-denominated securities (DDS)....
Cyber bullying in the Philippines
The pen is mightier than the sword or so the adage goes. When this was once said, it was to highlight the power of thoughts and ideas over brute force and violence as a way to effect change. Today, the ...
Uber/GrabCar drivers: Independent contractors or employees?
The buzz about the legality of Uber and GrabCar operating in the Philippines might have died down, but now there is another legal issue surrounding them: whether their drivers are employees or ...
Price fixing in the context of the Philippine Competition Act
In light of the enactment of the Philippine Competition Act (PCA) in 2015, competitors, manufacturers, retailers and sellers or suppliers, in general, should be ...
Implementation of the data privacy act in Philippines now in full swing
Since 2012, the Philippines has had a comprehensive law governing personal data privacy. However, full implementation ...
Taxability of service fees received by non-resident foreign companies from online advertising in the Philippines
The use of the internet for the promotion of goods and services, particularly social media (Facebook, Twitter and ...
Levelling the playing field in the Philippines
Before the enactment of the Philippine Competition Act in 2015, the Philippines was the only founding member of Asean that did not have a comprehensive competition law in place. Francisco Ed Lim, Patricia-Ann T Prodigalidad, Eric R Recalde of <...
Age discrimination in the workplace
Republic Act No. 10911 (also known as the ‘Anti-Age Discrimination in Employment Act’) lapsed into law on 21 July ...
Green jobs: greening the Philippine labour sector
With the threat of climate change, the international community created the Paris Agreement which aims to stop global warming and preserve ...
Interplay of domestic law on compulsory licensing and international agreements on medicine prices
The price of pharmaceutical products in the Philippines appears to be on the high side compared to that in other Asian ...
Restrictive covenants in employment contracts
One of the means of keeping afloat in today’s competitive market is to hire employees who are ‘fit’ for a particular job. However, before employers ...
Make our system work: litigation practice expedited
The perception that litigation is a slow and arduous process has drawn many of us closer to the idea of alternative modes of dispute resolution. ...
Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) Department Order No. 18-A: The Rules and Regulations on Contracting
On December 4, 2011, Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) Department Order No. 18-A (D.O. 18-A), the new Rules Implementing Articles 106 to 109 ...
An overview of Philippine Data Privacy Law
Republic Act No. 10173, or the Philippine Data Privacy Act of 2012 (RA10173), was signed into law on August 15, 2012. This is the ...
New competition law for the Philippines
The Philippine Competition Act (PCA) went into effect on August 5, 2015. The law applies not only to acts committed in the Philippines but ...
Related Articles
UAE – Dynamism in business and dispute resolution in the Gulf
With a variety of new legislation in the emirates, Louise Bowmaker of Horizons & Co looks at some of the most significant recent and upcoming changes ...
SCIA’s innovation: Optional appellate arbitration in China
A substantive appellate mechanism constitutes a beneficial complement to the finality of single-instance arbitration ...
Introducing Chinese arbitration to the world
Through open dialogue, BAC is developing the knowledge and expertise to become a leading arbitration hub among the international arbitration community ...
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
A 'return' to private practice
Three experienced Asia-based lawyers spoke to Tim Gilkison about their 'return' to private practice, and how to make a successful transition ...
Law Passed Strengthening Consumer Protection in the Philippines
On December 19, 2017, the Gift Check Act of 2017 (Republic Act No. 10962) was signed into law ...
Philippine Competition Commission Merger Review Guidelines
On 23 March 2017 the The Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) released the Merger Review Guidelines ...
Latest Articles
New Decree on special preferential import/export tariffs under the CPTPP
Plus recent Vietnam updates on insurance, public investment and minimum wages.
SCA issues guidelines for financial institutions on anti-money laundering
The advent of AML and ATF guidance is a welcome step for businesses in the UAE.
Update on Stamp Duty regulating electronic transactions
A new notification requires parties who enter certain electronic transactions to pay stamp duty in cash.