Philippines

Before the enactment of the Philippine Competition Act in 2015, the Philippines was the only founding member of Asean that did not have a comprehensive competition law in place. Francisco Ed Lim, Patricia-Ann T Prodigalidad, Eric R Recalde of ACCRALAW review the new regime.

Background
The 1987 Philippine Constitution mandates the state to “regulate or prohibit monopolies when the public interest so requires. No combinations in restraint of trade or unfair competition shall be allowed.”

In 2015, Congress passed Republic Act No. 10667, or the Philippine Competition Act (PCA). The PCA took effect on August 8, 2015.
The law was enacted in order to boost the Philippines’ readiness for the Association of South-East Asian Nations (Asean) market integration. Before the enactment of the PCA, the Philippines was the only one of the five founding member states of the Asean that did not have a comprehensive competition law in place.

The PCA covers not only domestic transactions, but even international transactions that may have “direct, substantial and reasonable foreseeable effect” on Philippine trade, industry or commerce. It prohibits anti-competitive agreements and conduct that have the objective or effect of substantially preventing, restricting or lessening competition. It also provides for a mandatory and suspensory merger notification regime.

The basic operational principles underpinning the law are as follows:

  • The primary goal of the PCA is to protect competition, not necessarily competitors or consumers;
  • An act having foreclosure effect is presumed to have exploitative effect;
  • The Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) has the burden to establish the act has foreclosure effect;
  • An act may have exclusionary effect but without exploitative effect;
  • An act may have exploitative effect but without exclusionary effect; and
  • The entity has the burden to establish that the act has neither exploitative nor exclusionary effect.

PCC and its powers
Tasked with the duty to implement the country’s competition policy is the PCC, an independent quasi-judicial body and an agency attached to the Office of the President. The PCC is composed of a chairperson and four commissioners, all of whom have fixed terms and enjoy security of tenure.
The PCC has a wide array of functions including rule-making, advisory, policy formulation, public education and compliance monitoring. It is also vested with original and primary jurisdiction over the enforcement and implementation of the provisions of the PCA and its implementing rules and regulations (IRR), and for this purpose, is authorised to exercise, among others, the following salient powers and functions:

  • Conduct inquiry, investigate, hear and decide cases involving any violation of the PCA and other existing competition laws, whether on its own initiative or upon verified complaint, as well as institute the appropriate civil or criminal proceedings;
  • Review proposed mergers and acquisitions, determine thresholds, requirements and procedures for notification and, thereupon, prohibit mergers and acquisitions that have anti-competitive effects;
  • After due notice and hearing and upon finding, based on substantial evidence, that an entity has entered into an anti-competitive agreement or has abused its dominant position, to issue injunctions, require divestment and disgorgement of excess profits or apply such other remedies to stop and redress such anti-competitive behaviour;
  • Conduct administrative proceedings, impose sanctions, fines or penalties for non-compliance with the PCA and its IRR;
  • Issue subpoenas, summon witnesses, administer oaths and issue interim orders such as cease-and-desist orders (CDOs);
  • Upon order of the court, undertake inspections of business premises and other offices, land and vehicles where it reasonably suspects relevant documents relating to any investigation are kept;
  • Issue adjustment or divestiture orders including orders for corporate reorganisation or divestment under certain parameters and in accordance with prescribed procedures;
  • Intervene or participate in administrative and regulatory proceedings requiring considerations of the PCA and initiated by government agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, Energy Regulatory Commission and the National Telecommunications Commission; and
  • Act as the official representative of the Philippine government in international competition matters.

Anti-competitive agreements
The PCA seeks to prevent or regulate anti-competitive agreements, between or among competitors (horizontal agreements) or, between or among non-competitors, such as with the entity’s suppliers or customers (vertical agreements).An “agreement” refers to any type or form of contract, arrangement, understanding, collective recommendation or concerted action, whether formal or informal, explicit or tacit, written or oral.Agreements are anti-competitive if the following elements are present:

  • Parties are competitors;
  • There is an understanding between or among parties towards the accomplishment of a particular objective;
  • The agreement must have substantial foreclosure effect on the relevant market;
  • There is no objective justification for such understanding.

Explicit violations include the fixing of prices, components thereof, or other terms of trade, and bid-rigging. All other violations are subject to the rule of reason test.

An entity that enters into anti-competitive agreement will be subject to criminal and civil liabilities. Other violations are subject only to administrative fines and civil liabilities.

Abuse of dominance
The PCA also punishes abusive conduct by a coercive monopolist when the following elements are present:

  • The entity has market power, specifically, a dominant position in the relevant market;
  • The entity commits abusive conduct;
  • The conduct has substantial foreclosure effect on the relevant market; or
  • There is no objective justification for the conduct.

The term “conduct” may refer to an action, practice or undertaking. Note that both the definitions of “conduct” and “agreement” include the terms “collective recommendation” and “concerted action”. The difference is that in agreements, there must be an understanding between or among the entities towards the accomplishment of a particular objective. As for conduct, the parties appear to act in concert, or have tacit coordination that falls short of an agreement. Tacit coordination may be established by proof of prior exchange of commercially sensitive information, and the effect of such exchange on the subsequent behaviour of the parties.

Mergers and acquisitions
Parties to a merger or acquisition wherein the value of the transaction meets the prescribed thresholds are prohibited from consummating their transaction until the PCC approves the transaction, or until the waiting period lapses and no decision has been made.

The Implementing Rules and Regulations provides for two tests: the size-of-person test and the size-of-transaction test.
The size-of-person test is assessed in reference to the ultimate parent entity, defined as the juridical entity that directly or indirectly controls a party to the transaction, and is not controlled by any other entity. The test requires that the gross annual revenue in, into or from the Philippines, or the value of the assets of the ultimate parent entity of at least one of the parties exceed Ps1 billion (~US$20m).
The size-of-transaction test depends on the kind of transaction contemplated. For proposed merger or acquisition of assets, the reference point is the location of the assets:

  • All assets are inside the Philippines — the value of the assets in the Philippines or gross revenues generated in the Philippines by assets acquired therein exceed Ps1 billion.
  • All assets are outside the Philippines — the value of the assets in the Philippines and gross revenues generated in or into the Philippines by those assets acquired outside the Philippines exceed Ps1 billion.
  • Some assets are inside and others outside the Philippines — the value of the assets in the Philippines of the acquiring entity and gross revenues generated in or into the Philippines and any assets acquired outside the Philippines collectively exceed Ps1 billion.

For proposed acquisition of voting shares of a corporation or of an interest in a non-corporate entity, the reference points are value of the assets/gross revenue of sales in, into or from the Philippines, and the level of control gained in the subject entity:

  • The value of the assets in the Philippines of the corporation or non-corporate entity exceeds Ps1 billion or the gross annual revenues from sales in, into or from the Philippines of the corporation or non-corporate entity or by any entity it controls, other than assets that are shares of any of those corporations exceeds Ps1 billion; and
  • The acquiring entity, together with its affiliates, would own voting control (35 percent) or gain further control (50 percent) in the subject entity.

In joint ventures (other than in connection with mergers and acquisitions), the contributing entities are deemed the acquiring entities and the joint venture is deemed the acquired entity. An acquiring entity shall notify the PCC if:

  • The aggregate value of the proposed joint venture exceeds Ps1 billion; or
  • The gross revenues generated in the Philippines by assets to be combined in the Philippines or contributed into the proposed joint venture exceed Ps1 billion.

Enforcement
To ensure that the objectives of the PCA and the national competition policy are attained, the PCC is expressly empowered to investigate, decide and, where warranted, impose administrative sanctions against erring entities. As a matter law, the PCC has the sole and exclusive authority to initiate and conduct, based on reasonable grounds, a fact-finding or preliminary inquiry for the enforcement of the PCA and its IRR. Though the inquiry may be initiated through a verified complaint by an interested party or upon referral by a regulatory agency, the PCC may also conduct the inquiry on its own initiative. In the event the inquiry leads to a full administrative investigation, the PCC may, after due notice and hearing, issue CDOs, impose administrative sanctions, file criminal complaints before the Philippine Department of Justice or even institute civil proceedings for violations of the PCA and other competition laws. As mentioned above, the PCC is likewise empowered to require divestment, order disgorgement of excess profits as well as direct other forms of corporate reorganisation.Administrative fines imposable by the PCC for violations of the PCA on anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, compulsory notification in covered mergers or acquisitions and prohibited mergers or acquisitions range from a fine of up to Ps100 million for the first offence and from Ps100 million up to Ps250 million for the second offence. Other administrative offenses that are punishable with fines are failure to comply with an order of the PCC, supply of incorrect or misleading information and other violations not specifically penalised under the PCA. Notably, the schedule of fines in the PCA shall be increased by the PCC every five years.For violations that are considered criminal in nature, that is, entering into explicit anti-competitive agreements and agreements restricting production and development or dividing markets under Sections 14(a) and 14(b), courts are authorised to sentence the guilty offender with imprisonment of two to seven years and a fine of Ps50 million to Ps250 million. Though the fine is payable by the erring entity or entities, the penalty of imprisonment shall be imposed upon the responsible officers, directors and managerial employees who are knowingly and wilfully responsible for the violation.

Whether the fine is criminal or administrative, the same shall be tripled if the violation involves the trade or movement of basic necessities or prime commodities.


An innovation introduced by the PCA into the competition regime is the express provision authorising a no contest plea. Under the PCA, entities charged in a criminal proceeding under Section 14(a) and 14(b), may to enter a plea of no contest, through which the entity neither accepts nor denies responsibility for the charges but agrees to accept punishment as if he had pleaded guilty. A no contest plea shall be subject to the court’s acceptance, which shall be given only after weighing its effect on the parties, the public and the administration of justice.Under Section 35 of the new law, the PCC is mandated to create a “leniency programme”, wherein an immunity or reduction of penalties shall be conferred to entities, subject to meeting certain conditions, in exchange for voluntary disclosure of information regarding the subject anti-competitive agreement provided the offer to disclose is made prior to or during the fact finding or preliminary stage of the inquiry. Such programme shall include immunity from any suit or charge, exemption, waiver or gradation of fines and/or penalties giving precedence to the entity submitting such evidence.The PCA also provides for non-adversarial remedies as a means to encourage voluntary compliance with the PCA before the institution of administrative, civil or criminal proceedings. These non-adversarial remedies include consent orders, under which an entity may, prior to the conclusion of the PCC’s inquiry and without admitting a violation of the PCA or any other competition law, submit a written proposal for the entry of a consent order that it is willing to abide by. Among the allowable terms of a consent order are the payment of an amount within the range of fines under the PCA, regular submission of compliance reports and payment of damages to private parties.

By express provision of the PCA, any action arising from a violation of any provision of the PCA shall be barred unless commenced within five years from (a) discovery of the violation by the offended party (for criminal actions) and (b) from the time the cause of action accrues (for civil and administrative actions). This is a significant deviation from most regulatory statutes that provide for the imprescriptibility of administrative actions. As to private actions, however, any person who suffers direct injury by reason of a violation of the PCA may institute a separate and independent civil action, but only after the PCC has completed its preliminary inquiry.

Judicial relief and other court intervention

Civil and criminal actions for violation of the PCA, its IRR and other competition related laws are originally and exclusively within the jurisdiction of the regional trial court of the city or province where the entity (or any of the entities), whose business act or conduct constitutes the subject of the case, has its (or have their) principal place(s) of business.

Decisions of the PCC are appealable to the Court of Appeals in accordance with the Rules of Court. The appeal, however, will not stay the execution of the order, ruling or decision subject of review unless the Court of Appeals shall so direct otherwise.

Other than the Court of Appeals or Supreme Court, no other court shall issue any temporary restraining order or issue any injunctive writ against the PCC to restrain the exercise of its duties or functions. By express provision of the PCA, this prohibition applies in all cases, even those instituted by private parties. The sole exception to the prohibition is when the matter is of extreme urgency involving a constitutional issue and the non-issuance of the restraining order will result in grave injustice and irreparable injury to the public.

Curative period
The PCA provides for a curative period of two years, whereby affected parties can renegotiate existing agreements or restructure of businesses to conform to the law.

–––––––––––––––––
E: felim@accralaw.com
ptprodigalidad@accralaw.com
errecalde@accralaw.com
W: www.accralaw.com

Related Articles by Firm
Compulsory investment of branch offices in the Philippines
The Revised Corporation Code introduced amendments to the otherwise outdated Corporation Code.
Philippines: The POGO problem – Harmonising immigration, gaming and gambling
It is highly illegal to gamble in China save for a few state-run lotteries. To avoid this prohibition, gambling companies operate offshore so that they may continue catering to Chinese nationals who play casino and e-games online ...
Developments in the Philippine Competition Commission’s enforcement activities
Early this year, the Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) Enforcement Office launched a leniency/whistleblower programme offering immunity from suit and reduction of fines to cartel members who will provide information that will help the PCC investigate and prosecute cartels ...
Revisiting the AMLA in light of transnational money laundering
For several decades, money laundering has extended the reach of transnational organised crime throughout various nations ...
Revisiting important concepts in arbitration
Philippine courts are keen on making arbitration and other modes of ADR the staple in settling disputes domestically.
Keeping your mobile number for a lifetime
A new law facilitates the easy movement of subscribers from one service provider to another.
The right to know: Freedom of information in the Supreme Court
Like all other rights, the “right to know” is not an absolute right.
The Philippines 11th Foreign Investment Negative List and its impact on online businesses
A more liberalised foreign participation may change the internet-based business landscape in the Philippines ...
The Philippine Competition Commission bares its teeth
For the first time since its inception in 2015, the Commission has blocked a merger after conducting its review.
A peek into the revised Corporation Code of the Philippines
On February 20, 2019, President Rodrigo Duterte signed into law Republic Act No. 11232, otherwise known as the Revised Corporation Code of the Philippines (the New Code) ...
Philippines: Protecting indigenous knowledge systems and practices in intellectual property rights registration
Indigenous peoples (IPs) and indigenous cultural communities (ICCs), though explicitly protected under the constitution itself, sadly remain one of the most marginalised and forgotten sectors in Philippine society ...
Philippines: The right to know – Freedom of information in the Supreme Court
Freedom of Information is a right enshrined in our fundamental law ...
Investments for the environment
In a recent report released by the leading international body for assessment of climate change, the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (UN IPCC), established a target global warming limit of 1.5°C ...
The PCC’s Joint Venture Guidelines
The Philippine Competition Commission must strive to strike a balance ...
How the Mental Health Act affects employees
Mental health conditions, which include anxiety and panic disorders, depression, eating disorders, substance abuse and addictions, have become a pervasive issue which permeates our present society ...
The Ease of Doing Business Act tapers red tape
RA 11032 is a welcome step towards achieving the quality government services that Filipinos deserve.
Much EndO about nothing
President Duterte says he has put an end to the “Endo” or the practice of engaging employees on a contractual basis. But has he?
Philippines: Proposed rules and regulations on crowdfunding
Crowdfunding (CF) platforms have proven to be a popular way to solicit charitable donations and to raise funds for projects or business ventures ...
Virtual currency in the Philippines: Recognition and regulation
Bitcoin is essentially a virtual currency (VC), which is any type of digital unit that is used as a medium of exchange — a veritable currency that exists in the digital world. Since it is electronic currency, VC is easily transferable ...
Protection of women employees in the Philippines
According to the World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap (GGG) Report conducted in 2016, the Philippines is the most gender-equal country in the Asia-Pacific region, having closed nearly 79 percent of its gender gap ...
Anti-Trust & Competition: Philippines - Towards robust yet balanced competition in the Philippines
The state of Philippine competition regulation has been slowly taking shape barely over two years after the passage of the Philippine Competition Act (RA 10667) ...
PHILIPPINES: The internet and doing business in the Philippines
Earlier this year, the Philippines Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued an opinion stating that an online gaming system with absolutely no physical presence in the Philippines shall be considered as “doing business” in the Philippines and was thus required ...
Philippines: Psychological disorders in the workplace
The problem of mental health presents a particular conundrum under labour relations and standards ...
Clarifying the role of contractors and subcontractors
Recent changes to labour laws in the Philippines attempt to clarify the status of contractors and subcontractors in certain industries ...
Fake news and its web of legal issues in the post-truth era
Oxford Dictionaries’ Word of the Year for 2016 is “post-truth” — an adjective defined as “relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief”. ...
Dollar-denominated securities in relation to Corporation Code’s provisions on capital
The Philippines Stock Exchange (PSE) issued rules on December 2, 2016 governing the listing, trading and settlement of US dollar-denominated securities (DDS)....
Cyber bullying in the Philippines
The pen is mightier than the sword or so the adage goes. When this was once said, it was to highlight the power of thoughts and ideas over brute force and violence as a way to effect change. Today, the ...
Uber/GrabCar drivers: Independent contractors or employees?
The buzz about the legality of Uber and GrabCar operating in the Philippines might have died down, but now there is another legal issue surrounding them: whether their drivers are employees or ...
Price fixing in the context of the Philippine Competition Act
In light of the enactment of the Philippine Competition Act (PCA) in 2015, competitors, manufacturers, retailers and sellers or suppliers, in general, should be ...
Implementation of the data privacy act in Philippines now in full swing
Since 2012, the Philippines has had a comprehensive law governing personal data privacy. However, full implementation ...
Taxability of service fees received by non-resident foreign companies from online advertising in the Philippines
The use of the internet for the promotion of goods and services, particularly social media (Facebook, Twitter and ...
Age discrimination in the workplace
Republic Act No. 10911 (also known as the ‘Anti-Age Discrimination in Employment Act’) lapsed into law on 21 July ...
Green jobs: greening the Philippine labour sector
With the threat of climate change, the international community created the Paris Agreement which aims to stop global warming and preserve ...
Interplay of domestic law on compulsory licensing and international agreements on medicine prices
The price of pharmaceutical products in the Philippines appears to be on the high side compared to that in other Asian ...
Restrictive covenants in employment contracts
One of the means of keeping afloat in today’s competitive market is to hire employees who are ‘fit’ for a particular job. However, before employers ...
Make our system work: litigation practice expedited
The perception that litigation is a slow and arduous process has drawn many of us closer to the idea of alternative modes of dispute resolution. ...
Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) Department Order No. 18-A: The Rules and Regulations on Contracting
On December 4, 2011, Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) Department Order No. 18-A (D.O. 18-A), the new Rules Implementing Articles 106 to 109 ...
An overview of Philippine Data Privacy Law
Republic Act No. 10173, or the Philippine Data Privacy Act of 2012 (RA10173), was signed into law on August 15, 2012. This is the ...
New competition law for the Philippines
The Philippine Competition Act (PCA) went into effect on August 5, 2015. The law applies not only to acts committed in the Philippines but ...
Related Articles
Disrupting the law
Technology has been changing the world of work since the dawn of the industrial revolution, but it is only in the past decade or so that technological innovations have truly started to disrupt the way that legal services are delivered ...
NewLaw takes-off in Southeast Asia
Rob Shakespeare of KorumLegal discusses the market for flexible and innovative legal solutions in one of the world’s fastest-growing regions ...
The five stages of the board management maturity model
The tools boards use to communicate should be simple to use, meet their needs (and no more) and be secure ...
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
How the Mental Health Act affects employees
Mental health conditions, which include anxiety and panic disorders, depression, eating disorders, substance abuse and addictions, have become a pervasive issue which permeates our present society ...
Law passed promoting ease of doing business in the Philippines
A law promoting the ease of doing business and efficient delivery of government services took effect this June 2018.
Islamic banking and finance in the Philippines
The recent passage of Republic Act No. 11054 augurs well for the development of Islamic banking and finance in the Philippines ...
Latest Articles
Rules of civility
Introducing the mindful business charter.
Three key skills I wish I'd been taught in my law degree
Legal educators must arm graduates with the tools needed to embark on their legal journey.
Personal Data Protection Act published in the Government Gazette
Business operators should ensure that their businesses comply with the PDPA.