By Rahul Beruar and Jyotsana Sinha, Clasis LawClasis_Jyotsana Sinha-2

Email :,


Rapidly growing awareness of intellectual property (IP) rights and a well-structured statutory regime protecting IP has allowed rights owners to assert and enjoy the limited monopolies conferred on them and prevent/restrain unauthorised third parties from infringing or misappropriating the exclusive rights. While IP jurisprudence is constantly evolving to protect rights owners from unauthorised encroachment of their exclusive rights in the IP, it has also led to a trend of overzealous IP enforcement, often resulting in undue liability on innocent third parties. Furthermore, such overzealous enforcement of IP rights becomes a hindrance when groundless threats by rights owners adversely affect the businesses of innocent third parties involved in lawful and permitted use of another’s IP.
In one such instance, a well-known manufacturer of automotive spare parts was being threatened with groundless legal proceedings of trademark infringement by a leading automobile manufacturer and its exclusive licencee in India. Based on the premise that the packaging of the genuine spare parts read: “Suitable for <<the make and model of the particular automobile>>”, and that such use of the make and model of the automobile (being a registered trade mark of the automobile manufacturer) qualified as infringement of the automobile manufacturer’s registered trade mark, among other things, the exclusive licencee of the said automobile manufacturer had filed several criminal complaints and lodged FIRs, spread across various cities in India, against the spare-parts manufacturer’s distributors, dealers and so on, which led to seizure of genuine spare parts produced by the spare-parts manufacturer. Interestingly, while distributors and stockists of the said spare-parts manufacturer were subjected to criminal proceedings, no civil or criminal proceedings were initiated against the said spare-parts manufacturer itself.
Use of the words “Suitable for” before make and model of the automobile for which a particular spare part was suited and the prominently displayed well-known house marks of the spare-parts manufacturer clearly qualified as nominative use, permitted under Section 30(d) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Consequently, although protected by fair/permitted use provision under the Act, the said spare-parts manufacturer was constantly subjected to groundless threats of infringement proceedings.
We took recourse to one of the lesser explored remedies available under the Act, and initiated legal proceedings against such groundless threats.
Section 142 of the Act provides that a person threatened by the proprietor of a trade mark with an action/proceeding for infringement of trademark by means of issuing circulars, advertisements or otherwise, can bring a suit against such person making the threat and seek any or all of the following reliefs: (a) declaration to the effect that such threats are unjustifiable; (b) an injunction against continuance of the threats; (c) recover damages, if any.
However, protecting the proprietors from frivolous litigation each time they attempt to enforce their rights, Section 142 further states that if the trade mark in question is registered and the acts in respect of which the proceedings were threatened, constitute or, if done, would constitute infringement of the trade mark, then the threat of proceedings made will be deemed justified. Moreover, if the registered proprietor/user conducts due diligence and initiates infringement proceedings against the said person threatened, then such threat would be deemed to have materialised and no recourse would be available with such person threatened except for to defend themselves in infringement proceedings initiated by the rights holder.
Oddly, while there are specific provisions affording protection against groundless threats of proceedings in the Indian IP regime, such provisions are rarely resorted to, resulting in a dearth of jurisprudence on several aspects of the framework, such as the definition of threat and “person” who can resort to the such legal remedy, among other things.
Nonetheless, to protect the rights of the said spare-parts manufacturer, we filed a civil suit under Section 142 of the Act against the automobile manufacturer and its exclusive licencee on the basis that the criminal complaints filed by/on behalf of the automobile manufacturer amount to groundless threat of trademark infringement; seeking a declaration that the use by the said spare-parts manufacturer of the make and model of the automobile on its spare parts does not amount to trademark infringement as such use falls within the exemption granted under the Act and sought injunction against continuance of such threats. While the matter is still sub-judice, the automobile manufacturer has undertaken before the court that it shall, along with its exclusive licencee, refrain from issuing any further threats until further orders are passed by the court in the said matter.


Clasis Law Logo






Tel: (91) 11 4213 0000

Fax: (91) 11 4213 0099

Tags: Compliance, India, Intellectual Property
Related Articles by Firm
India going all out to woo foreign companies moving out of China
A silver lining of the Covid-19 crisis is the potential of becoming an attractive alternative to China.
Doing business and ease of doing business in India
VIDEO BRIEFING: The government has taken numerous steps to give an impetus to foreign investment, but a lot remains to be done.
MCA introduces e-form DIR-3-KYC for directors with approved DINS
This compliance exercise seems to be a checkpoint for only genuine individuals acting as directors in a legitimate capacity.
A wide net of ineligibilities for being a resolution applicant
Almost two years after the Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee submitted its report, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is still a work in progress.
Insolvency in India: Section 29A…
A wide net of ineligibities for being a Resolution Applicant ...
DISHA — India’s probable response to the law on protection of digital health data
Sensitisation and protection of people’s right to privacy and security of their data are the bedrock of DISHA.
The Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017
This much-awaited piece of legislation brings clarity to various deadlocks in Indian jurisprudence.
Metro projects likely to drive India's infrastructure sector
Metro Rail projects in India have picked up pace and are likely to catalyse substantial opportunities over the next few years.
Handling disciplinary proceedings by employers
Breach of an employment contract by an employee often results in disciplinary action leading up to termination in cases of serious misconduct.
Clasis Law Newsletter
The latest legal news from India, including recent court judgments, changes to corporate/commercial law and updates on projects and IP.
Initial Coin Offerings: Another brainteaser in the virtual currency bandwagon
The position of virtual currencies and ICOs in India remains murky.
The impact of General Data Protection Regulations on Indian companies
Extraterritorial applicability of GDPR makes it clear that these regulations will be applicable regardless of whether the processing takes place in EU or not.
ONGC vs Sime Darby consortium
An unsuccessful party cannot possibly apply for interim relief in aid of what it lost before the arbitral tribunal.
The Fugitive Economic Offenders Bill 2018
The bill aims to provide an effective, expeditious and constitutionally permissible deterrent to ensure that such actions are curbed.
Understanding The Maharashtra Shops And Establishments Rules 2018
The Act regulates the employer–employee relationship and service conditions such as hours of work, payment of wages, overtime, leave, holidays, etc.
Supreme Court gives clarity on Section 26 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015
In Board of Control for Cricket in India vs Kochi Cricket, the Supreme Court has clarified some issues surrounding the Act.
Delhi High Court resolves uncertainty between two conflicting clauses in contracts
The settled principle of contra proferentem has been re-affirmed by the Court in a case involving Delhi Metro Rail and Voestalpine.
India: Supreme Court update
Supreme Court refers the question to determine the liability of the consignee or steamer agent in respect of ground rent charges to be paid to the port trust to a larger bench ...
Corporate Social Responsibility
There is a growing realization among the corporates that business growth along with positive community/social impact is now an expected goal ...
India: Execution Proceedings for Enforcement of Arbitral Award
Recent Supreme Court judgement resolves certain issues and requirements ...
India: Impact of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017
With the assent of the President on January 3, 2018, the much-awaited Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 (Amendment Act), which provides for simpler provisions but stringent penalties, has finally seen the light of the day ...
Voluntary Liquidation in India
Winding up under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ...
Strike Off of Companies in India
Over the years, many companies have been lagging behind in filing of annual documents such as annual returns, financial statements etc ...
India: Valuation by Registered Valuer
“Price is what you pay, Value is what you get” ...
India: Amendments Under Master Directions on Issuance and Operation of Prepaid Payment by RBI
Digital wallets such as PayTM, along with debit and credit cards, are expected to reduce (if not completely replace) the use of paper currency …
India: Institutional Arbitration – Need of the Hour
The need to promote and encourage institutional arbitration for commercial disputes in India ...
India: Supreme Court settles the law: Major relief for foreign operational creditors
Clasis Law recently represented Macquarie Bank in two civil appeals before the Supreme Court of India ...
India: Consumer Protection
NCDRC’s ruling on ‘Voluntary Consumer Association’ under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ...
India: Foreign Exchange Management Regulation
Significant changes for transfer or issue of security to a person resident outside India ...
India: Directors' duties and liabilities under the Companies Act, 2013
Directors must be aware of their role, responsibilities and duties towards the company and its shareholders ...
India Update for December 2017
This edition brings to our readers a featured article titled “The Tourism and Hospitality Sector 2017 — The Year Gone By!!”
India: RBI issues Directions on Peer to Peer Lending Platform
Online lending transactions are in their nascent stage in India and given the increase in peer-to-peer (P2P) lending through e-commerce marketplace it is of extreme importance to regulate such transactions ...
INDIA: Right to privacy and data protection in India
The concept of data protection and privacy has not been addressed in any exclusive comprehensive legislation in India ...
Corporate compliance: Necessity and implication
The Companies Act of India is the primary legislation governing the functioning of companies established in India during their lifecycle....
India update from Clasis Law
Including briefings on the national food processing policy, projects and energy, and intellectual property.
RBI intervenes in patching up of Tata and DoCoMo’s joint venture
Background to the joint venture: Tata DoCoMo, an Indian mobile network operator, was set up as a joint venture between Tata Teleservices (TTSL) and NTT DoCoMo in November 2008...
Regulatory challenges for Vodafone Idea merger
Vodafone India is in discussions with Idea Cellular for an all-share merger. It appears that the intense competition the Indian telecom industry is facing due to freebies offered by the new entrant, Reliance Jio, has ...
India Update, inc: Regulatory challenges for Vodafone Idea merger
This months India newsletter from Clasis Law includes an article on the “Regulatory challenges for Vodafone Idea merger”, plus updates in Projects, Energy, IP and Banking & Finance ...
Investment conditions and restrictions for venture capital funds
Venture capital funds (VCFs) are contributing considerably to India’s economic growth. The amount of investment directed to venture capital has grown in recent years due to the pro-business environment and ...
India’s bid to become a hub for international commercial arbitration
As one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, India is a party to many international commercial arbitrations and the government is making efforts ...
Brands – Role and liability of celebrity endorsers
The marketing and advertising industry has grown as an organised industry using innovative ideas that are designed to ...
Related Articles
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
India's The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 makes major changes to the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996
The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance 2015 gives the necessary impetus for ease of conducting arbitration in India and enables speedy settlement of commercial disputes.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
According to the World Bank, India is ranked 136 among 189 countries on the parameter of resolving insolvency and ....
Latest Articles