August 16, 2021
Georgia Foster knows a thing or two about instilling a culture of innovation and growth. In her role as APAC managing director at global legal and compliance technology company Relativity, Foster runs the team driving growth across the region. Previously she ran Uber’s corporate division in Australia/New Zealand, and before that was on LinkedIn’s global team. Foster sat down with IHC to chat about e-discovery and compliance challenges facing in-house legal teams, how in-house counsel can encourage legal tech innovation, how to secure data, how in-house legal work will change and how Asia is the new frontier for technology adoption. Tell Us About Relativity And Why You Chose To Join The Team Relativity makes software to help users organize data, discover the truth and act on it. Our global SaaS platform, RelativityOne, manages large volumes of data and quickly identifies key issues during legal investigations. And our AI-powered communication surveillance platform, Relativity Trace, proactively detects regulatory misconduct like insider trading, collusion and other non-compliant behavior. Relativity has clients in 49 countries serving thousands of legal, financial services and government organizations. When I joined Relativity last September, what stood out immediately was the incredible community of people rallied around the technology. The entire team is comprised of passionate and smart individuals, hungry to make a difference in the world. As I spoke with more customers, it became clear this culture has translated to an incredible product and a global community of more than 300,000 annual users sharing their expertise to solve important problems. What really sets Relativity apart and was key to my decision to join the team, is that... August 13, 2021
Eoin Gillen (APAC General Counsel for BNP Paribas) speaks to Stephanie Szeto (head of Peerpoint) about the challenges and opportunities of embracing technological transformation within the BNP Paribas in-house legal team. Stephanie: Could you tell us a bit about how BNP Paribas has successfully leveraged technology in your legal team’s innovation? Eoin: With the technological transformation going on around us, legal departments simply cannot afford to ignore the possibilities that digital innovations bring. We’ve developed a number of things, some in partnership with vendors and others internally. As part of a large financial institution, and with banks themselves becoming more like large technology companies, when it comes to things like document automation tools the legal department is part of a bigger product and process chain. BNP Paribas is not just looking at the production of legal documentation, but every element of the transaction from start to end. Some of our document automation initiatives have been in that context, but our in-house legal function is also large enough to justify investment in technological solutions that are tailor-made to meet our needs. We’ve invested significantly in document automation tools for standardized contracts and have been are upskilling certain staff with basic coding skills to get the most out of those tools. We’ve also built a proprietary legal risk reporting tool that is being used globally, allowing us to monitor and track the development of new legal risks. That creates a structured data set that can be analyzed to anticipate risks and spot risk trends and patterns, so we can focus resources or beef up talent as we need to. Stephanie: How... July 6, 2021
Many foreign investors expected to see an upsurge of new or rekindled existing energy projects in Myanmar during 2021. They hoped the November 2020 elections would be the catalyst for the continued liberalization and expansion of Myanmar’s energy sector. The most noteworthy project tender of 2020 was the Solar Power Tender issued by the Electric Power Generation Enterprise (EPGE) under the Ministry of Electricity and Energy (MOEE) for the purchase of electricity at Designated Connection Points from independent power producers at 30 sites across the country. The combined capacity of the power plants was projected to be about 1 GW and construction would begin in 2021 as per the EPGE’s tender conditions. There were other LNG-to-power and infrastructure projects for which preferred concessionaires were selected and negotiations well underway. As predicted, the Aung San Suu Kyi-led National League for Democracy (“NLD”) was voted into power with a resounding majority. However, on 1 February, 2020, a state of emergency was declared by General Min Aung Hlaing, Commander-in-Chief of the Defense Services. Suu Kyi along with other senior members of the NLD were arrested and put under house arrest. The combined powers of the legislative, executive and judicial branches were vested with the State Administrative Council (SAC). As a result, most projects are halted or in limbo and project developers are increasingly wary of continued activity given the legal uncertainty of the current regime and certification status of their projects. Legal And Regulatory Framework For Projects The regulatory flow for projects in Myanmar typically follows a pattern where the project company (set up by the investor) negotiates an agreement with the... July 6, 2021
In March, Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) submitted its draft Power Development Plan VIII for 2021-2030 to the Prime Minister for consideration and approval. According to the document, the mix of natural gas in power generation sources is expected to rise from 14.9% in 2020 to 26% in 2045 and will significantly replace coal. An estimated US$180 billion will be needed over the next decade to meet the expansion targets for gas and renewables generation facilities, along with LNG gas terminals. As with many developing countries, the likely desirable investment model for LNG-to-power projects in Vietnam is a public-private partnership (PPP). Among the available PPP models in Vietnam, build-operate-transfer (BOT) is probably the most realistic considering the availability of an established legal framework for off-taking and state-sponsored contracts and precedent BOT projects. Sponsors would want the power project to be owned by the BOT company under a BOT contract with the relevant state authority and the LNG infrastructure to be owned by a separate joint venture company, with the cost of LNG infrastructure to be passed through to the electricity tariff. Under current legislation, non-BOT power projects (except solar or wind) are generally ineligible for off-taking arrangements, and are instead required to sell on the “competitive electricity market,” which may raise an important bankability issue. Against this background, Vietnam recently passed a PPP Law and an Investment Law, while issuing a new decree to implement the new PPP Law called Decree 35/2021/ND-CP (together, the “New Laws”). These took effect in early 2021. The changes are not fundamental but do include some features which may be material to... June 24, 2021
Over the past five years, solar electricity developers (developers) have busily installed photovoltaic (PV) panels on the rooftops all over Thailand. For commercial and industrial (C&I) businesses, the panels were an easy sell. For instance, PV installations are often financed by the developers, rooftop solar reduces overall electricity costs and the glare caused by the sun shimmering off PV panels can display the occupant’s green credentials. Developers are seeking premier projects such as new factories or stores with creditworthy occupants as they expand their portfolios in Thailand. The initial exuberance remains, but some developers are hesitant to enter Thailand perceiving that many of the best opportunities have already been seized. However, Thailand’s rooftop solar sector can still expand so interested developers must be aware of relevant regulations so they can take advantage of these opportunities. This article will look at how the market might consolidate if developers sell some of their existing assets, which may also create refinancing and bankability concerns. The potential impact of carbon trading markets will also be discussed. Market Consolidation – Regulatory Issues For Buyers And Sellers There are a significant number of developers active in Thailand’s rooftop solar sector and much of their financing is sourced from shareholder equity contributions or corporate lending. This has resulted in projects tying-up developers’ capital and delaying expansion plans. To free up some of this cash, developers may look to sell off existing projects which would consolidate the market and result in merger control issues. Merger Control In 2009, Thailand’s Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) enacted the Regulation on the Establishment of Criteria to Prevent Mergers, Competition Lessening or... June 23, 2021
A brief discussion on how should MNCs respond to OECD’s new measures relating to Automatic Exchange of Information and Transfer Pricing issues. AEOI And CRS – Enhanced Tax Controls On Tax Evasion We are living in a globalized world, and cross-border activities have become the norm in the last few decades. In the past, multinational corporations (“MNCs”) often adopt aggressive tax strategies by booking most profits in tax heavens where information sharing with foreign tax authorities is often minimal. The result is that tax authorities across the world often face difficulties in gathering sufficient offshore asset and transactional information of the tax payers to conduct tax assessment in their home jurisdiction. To unplug loopholes, the OECD has led the international effort in the implementation of Automatic Exchange of Information (“AEOI”) and adoption of the Common Reporting Standard (“CRS”). In order for participating countries to enjoy the mutual benefits of information exchange, financial institutions (“FIs”) of a participating country are required to report financial information regularly to local tax authorities which is then transmitted to their overseas counterparts in exchange of similar information from other participating jurisdictions. It is noteworthy that more than 100 jurisdictions are already committed to AEOI implementation as at June 2020. Why Relevant To Me? Let’s assume that you are a tax resident of your home Country A and have offshore assets or income in Country B. If both countries are committed to AEOI, Country B will become duty-bound to share your financial information automatically with tax authorities of Country A such that the latter may track your offshore investments beyond national borders, carry out tax avoidance... Upcoming Events
Recent Past Events














