Krishnabhagwan Rajaram Sharma vs M/S Tata Motors Finance Ltd; [Arbitration Petition No.304 of 2014] decided on 4th March 2015: The petitioner (being the respondent in arbitration) filed an application under section 34 of the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) to set aside the exparte award dated October 7, 2013.

Brief facts of the case:
The petitioner approached the respondent for a loan of Rs.19,64,000/- in December 2009. The respondent sanctioned the loan vide agreement dated December 30, 2009, payable in monthly installments of Rs.50,797/- w.e.f. March 2, 2010. On May 2, 2012 the respondent issued a loan recall notice calling upon the ppetitioner to pay sum of Rs.12,07,650.77 and terminated the agreement and also called upon vide notice under Section 21 of the act stating that failure to abide would give rise to a right to appoint a sole arbitrator.

An arbitrator was appointed and the petitioner was notified. The respondent filed a claim petition under Section 17 of the act and ad-interim ex-parte order was passed. The arbitrator issued notice to the petitioner to remain present on June 16, 2012 failing which the matter shall be dismissed or proceeded ex-parte.

On June 16, 2012 the petitioner filed an application under section 13(2) of the act, before the sole arbitrator challenged his appointment. The matter was adjourned. On July 28, 2012, neither the petitioner nor his advocate were present before the sole arbitrator at the time of hearing of the application and the matter was adjourned to subsequent further dates. The petitioner received a copy of the Award dated October 7, 2013 passed by the learned arbitrator.

Contentions of the lawyers of the petitioner and respondent:
The lawyer of the petitioner submits that the learned arbitrator ought to have issued notice to the petitioner before proceeding with the matter ex parte against the petitioner and in absence of such cautions notice informing the petitioner that the learned arbitrator would proceed ex-parte against the petitioner in case of the petitioner failing to remain present. Therefore, the award rendered by the learned arbitrator is in violation of principle of natural justice.

However, the lawyer of the respondent submits that since the petitioner chose not to participate in the proceeding inspite of full knowledge, they cannot urge that the learned arbitrator proceeded exparte and in the case the arbitrator has right to go ahead with the proceeding in the absence of the petitioner.

Judgement and conclusion: The Honourable Court observed that Section 24(2) of the Arbitration Act, provides that the parties shall be given sufficient advanced notice of any hearing and of any meeting of the arbitral tribunal for the purpose of inspection of documents, goods or other property and under section 25(c) of the Arbitration Act, if a party fails to appear at an oral hearing, the arbitral tribunal may continue proceedings and make the arbitral award on the evidence before it. Hence, there is no provision under the Arbitration Act, which makes it mandatory for an arbitrator to issue a caution notice to a party for every meeting stating that in absence of such party, the learned arbitrator would proceed with the proceedings ex-parte.

Further, the Honourable Court relied on the judgement of Noor Shaikh Mohammed Hussain Vs. Tata Motors Limited in Arbitration Petition No.937 of 2010 wherein the High Court of Bombay held that once a party had failed to attend the proceedings in absence of the petitioner. The court did not interfere with the ex-parte award rendered by the learned arbitrator in view of the petitioner remaining absent from time to time.

The court observed that after perusal of the record indicates that the petitioner had admittedly not responded to the loan recall notice issued by the respondent. The petitioner did not file any written statement. Further, the court observed that it is not the case of the petitioner in the petition that they were not defaulters. Therefore, the court held that the learned arbitrator had considered the evidence on record made available by the respondent and has highly allowed the claims made by the respondents in absence of the petitioner. Hence, there is no ground made out for interference with the award which is passed and therefore the petition need not be admitted.

Clasis Law
1st Floor, Bajaj Bhawan
226, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021, India
Tel: (91) 22 4910 0000 / Fax: (91) 22 4910 0099

Related Articles by Firm
Radical changes in the Foreign Direct Investment regime
INDIA- It is observed that India has the potential to attract even more foreign investment which could be achieved by liberalising ...
Clasis Law India Newsletter - July Edition
This edition covers the liberalized FDI regime, as well as certain key judgments passed by the Supreme Court of India, changes in corporate and commercial matters and updates in projects, energy and natural resources and IP sectors.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
According to the World Bank, India is ranked 136 among 189 countries on the parameter of resolving insolvency and ....
Compulsory licensing of patents in India: a human rights issue as well!
The compulsory licensing regime in India has always been embroiled in controversy, more so when it involves compulsory ...
A take on Budget 2016
Union Budget 2016 was presented amid a complex political situation arising out of the intolerance ...
Review of the various initiatives launched by the government in 2015
The government of India, in the year 2015, announced a slew of schemes to catalyse foreign investment in areas that would help in ...
PM Modi’s ‘Make in India’ tracing the steps of the lion?
In 2014, the government of India (Government) launched its flagship programme under the brand ‘Make in India’ to boost the manufacturing sector....
Mare Maritime Singapore Pte Ltd Vs. M.T. Everrich 8 [Notice of Motion (L) No. 2418 of 2015 in Admiralty Suit No. 854 of 2015]
Background: The owners of EVERRICH 8 (the Vessel), through their subsidiary Yuanland Ltd, entered into voyage charterparty with Rakha Al Khaleej International LLC ...
India's The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 makes major changes to the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996
The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance 2015 gives the necessary impetus for ease of conducting arbitration in India and enables speedy settlement of commercial disputes.
Multiple lenders = multiple stamping
On August 11, 2015 the division bench of the Supreme Court of India overturned a full bench decision of the Gujarat High Court in the matter of Coastal Gujarat Power Limited v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority....
Indian patent office revokes Hoffman-La Roche’s ‘Valganciclovir’ patent
The Controller of Patents (India) recently revoked the patent granted for the anti-retroviral drug ‘Valganciclovir’ used for treating active cytomegalovirus retinitis infection (CMV) ...
Urban reforms – three urban rejuvenation schemes launched
There is a compelling need to develop sustainable and technology-driven urban centres, partly as the burgeoning urban population is creating pressure on existing cities and partly to address the growing ...
Highlights of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015
The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015 (Amendment Act), which aims to amend the rigidities of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act), has ...
India - Projects, energy and infrastructure update
Including: Long-term infrastructure bonds;Smart cities mission and urban rejuvenation scheme; Railways to e-auction re-development of stations; New hybrid annuity model of PPP for the road sector; Shell set for global acquisition of BG; and IFC signs master co-operation agreement ...
The New Land Bill – ground reality
The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015 (2015 Bill) was …
Prima Facie Validity of a registered trade mark in India – A strong but rebuttable presumption
The Indian trademarks law recognises both statutory as well as common law remedy to protect the rights of the proprietor of a trade mark. However, it is well-known that …
Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill passed as ordinance in India
The long-awaited Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill (the Bill) has become a provisional law in India. The Bill, which could not be passed in Parliament in its winter session, was promulgated by the President …
Need for uniform stamp duty incidence across all States of India
‘Stamp Duty’ is a tax levied on an instrument by which any right or liability is, or purports to be created, transferred, limited, extended, extinguished or recorded …
‘Make in India’ campaign: Opportunities for investors
With a vision of leading the economy towards a path of high sustainable growth, the Prime Minister of India on September 25th, 2014 launched the ‘Make in India’ campaign. Through the …
Bumpy road ahead for vehicle manufacturers in India – pulled up by the competition watchdog
South Asian markets are one of the fastest growing markets for vehicle manufacturers worldwide. However, doing business in South Asia has its own challenges. The anti-monopoly watchdog of India …
Introduction of real estate investment trusts in India
The Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) in India have been in the news for some time. The World Bank1 describes REIT as a security sold to investors for the purpose of investing in real estate. REITs …
SC Larger Bench decision in case of Kone Elevators – distinction between ‘contracts of sale’ vis-a-vis ‘works contract’
The Constitutional Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court (SC), over-ruling the earlier decision of three-member Bench re State of A.P. v. Kone Elevators (India) Ltd1, has held that the activity of manufacturing, …
Companies Act, 2013 – implications for investors
One of the recent initiatives of the Indian Government towards ensuring sustainable economic growth and improving investment climate is enactment …
India Update, inc. Medical device controls
An overview of how and where regulatory controls apply to medical devices in India. Plus: key judgements passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court; changes in corporate and commercial matters; and case laws in indirect taxation.
Related Articles
The New Normal: An interview with LOD’s head of innovation and design
We speak with Anthony Wright about the development of lexvoco, joining forces with LOD and the future of legal in Asia.
Don’t suffer FOMO* for Southeast Asia LegalTech!
Avoid the 'fear of missing out' by embracing the incredible opportunities technology offers.
Regulating the sale and provision of digital content through mobile cellular networks
The regulation is becoming more relevant as investors are increasingly interested in the digital content market.
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
India Special Report
In this month’s Special Report on India, we take a look at how the country’s robust economy has helped Asia survive the global financial crisis and ask whether its legal sector is likely to follow the example of ...
Our M&A Report includes SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan's article 'Further liberalisation and consolidation of the banking sector' and Phoenix Legal's contribution 'M&A Booster – New Companies Act has it all easy and ...
Latest Articles
David Miles remembered
We mourn the passing of a remarkable lawyer and dear friend.
The New Normal: An interview with LOD’s head of innovation and design
We speak with Anthony Wright about the development of lexvoco, joining forces with LOD and the future of legal in Asia.
Don’t suffer FOMO* for Southeast Asia LegalTech!
Avoid the 'fear of missing out' by embracing the incredible opportunities technology offers.