Asia (Other)

Erick Gunawan talks to Rakesh Kirpalani, chief technology officer at Drew & Napier.


Rakesh Kirpalani

Rakesh Kirpalani

Should all companies have information governance officers?

Ideally, everyone should have a basic understanding of the company’s IT infrastructure, not least because as more companies digitise, the risk of cyber threats increases. A cyberattack can come from anywhere and it is now very common for attacks to originate from company employees who inadvertently allow an attacker into the system. However, it is particularly critical for a company’s crisis response team to be familiar with the company’s IT infrastructure to be able to respond decisively when required. At the same time, designated information governance officers responsible for formulating data management policies and executing the same would be important given the increasing scrutiny on the manner a company stores and protects its data.

How can external counsel work with forensic experts to assist organisations on issues concerning electronically stored information?

The interface between legal rights and obligations and technology is often a blind-spot for most lawyers and in-house counsel who usually tend to be less technologically inclined and focus on more traditional methods of protecting their client’s interests. Similarly, forensic experts are experts in electronic evidence preservation and analysis, but they usually do not have the ability to creatively consider legal or commercial solutions to problems.

It is crucial for the two disciplines to interface more and understand the synergies that exist between them. It often helps to have a tech-savvy lawyer or a legally trained forensic expert to bridge the gap. It is often quite surprising as to how effectively solutions to commercial problems or crafting legal arguments can be found when technology and law collide. From a practical perspective, this means that forensic evidence preservation, review and analysis may need to become part of mainstream legal practice with both lawyers and forensic experts playing their roles seamlessly to serve the client’s interests.

What challenges do you see facing in-house lawyers who need to work with their IT counterparts?

Often, in-house lawyers and their IT counterparts will speak different “languages” and have different concerns. For instance, in a situation where a company has suffered a malware attack, the IT department’s chief concern may be getting to the technological root cause of the issue, while the legal department’s main concern may be preserving privilege over any investigative report commissioned by IT and the accompanying regulatory risk.

Differences in the “languages” spoken also manifest in day-to-day operations. Taking the current Covid-19 situation as an example, where many employees may be forced to work from home, IT’s selection of a third-party service provider for teleconferencing may be driven by certain technological features, but a legal counsel will have to carefully scrutinise both the terms and conditions of use, as well as the protocols used by the system to transmit data, to ensure they are secure.

How can in-house lawyers address these challenges?

In-house counsel should take the time and effort to understand their company’s IT infrastructure. This does not mean they should be fluent in such matters, but they should have at least a conceptual understanding of how the company’s IT infrastructure works, its strengths and weaknesses, and be updated on IT developments and exploits.

At the same time, in-house counsel should hold regular training courses for their IT counterparts to educate them on issues such as regulatory risk and privilege. The goal would be for in-house lawyers and their IT counterparts to be able to bridge the gap in the “languages” to better protect their organisation and its interests.


Law In Order is a leading provider to the legal profession of eDiscovery and legal support services including forensic data collection, information governance, managed document review, and virtual arbitration or mediation services. We provide a secure, flexible and responsive outsourced service of unparalleled quality to law firms, government agencies and inhouse corporate legal teams. The Law In Order team is comprised of lawyers, paralegals, system operators, consultants and project managers, with unparalleled knowledge and experience in legal technology support services.

Screenshot 2020-04-29 at 5.45.11 PM
By Erick Gunawan


Screenshot 2020-04-29 at 5.45.22 PM

Rakesh Kirpalani
(Dispute Resolution & Information Technology)


Screen Shot 2019-04-12 at 3.34.17 PM

Related Articles by Firm
Data collection and early case assessment for investigations
Data collection and analysis for investigations is very different to collection for discovery or review. This article discusses the differences; how Early Case Assessment (ECA) can assist and the benefits of using review technology ...
Spotlight on eDiscovery
Many people are still confused about what electronic discovery encompasses ...
Will we see the end of Keywords in eDiscovery?
With the advances in Technology Assisted Review (TAR), it raises questions as to whether keywords still have a place in eDiscovery ...
How to Make Data Collection More ‘Effective’
Data can be collected efficiently, but if relevant data is not collected then the case will not come together.
Information Governance: Preserving Data and Being Prepared for Investigation
Organisations need to ensure their rules around information governance are being enforced. Many US organisations have an information governance officer in their IT, legal ...
Computer Forensics and the Rise of the Drone
With more people being confined to their homes in different parts of the globe, hobbyists will be finding new uses for their drones ...
Redactions? How to Ensure There are no Nasty Surprises
With recent headlines highlighting the damage and embarrassment that can be caused by poorly redacted documents, it is no wonder many firms and corporates are turning to legal document management specialists to secure their redactions ...
Self-Collection Risks
When digital evidence is required at the start of a matter, it’s easy to get swept up in the moment and start rushing to gather the evidence but this is a key time to step back, take a moment ...
What Happens After the Dawn Raid?
The dawn raid has led to the forensic collection of 100,000 documents, now safely secured on a hard drive. What is the process from here? It’s important to plan your strategy in advance to minimise downtime, extract relevant documents and ...
Bringing eDiscovery In-House? Four Tips to Get You Started
With an increase in litigation and in costs for document review, more and more companies are considering bringing parts, if not all, of the eDiscovery process in house ...
A Lawyer’s Future is Looking Sharp with Electronic Hearings
The benefits of running an efficient collection and forensic process extends all the way to the hearings room ...
Forensic investigations, the role of corporate counsel and the rise of information governance
Head of Forensics – Erick Gunawan, discusses the Role of Corporate Counsel in the context of litigation or investigation and the increasing importance of information governance ...
Forensic investigations and cross-border matters
What are the current trends in forensic investigations for cross-border matters? Head of Forensics - Erick Gunawan, looks at the constant evolution in data types and volumes, and the ever-tightening data privacy laws and regulatory intervention ...
Adopting eDiscovery for internal investigations
In-house counsel are often called on to manage an internal investigation. How can you effectively plan for and manage these investigations? We explore how electronic discovery (eDiscovery) tools help you mitigate risk and achieve your fact-finding mission.
The evidence collector that’s always with you
It is an integral part of our life these days and an item that is rarely further than arm’s reach ...
Related Articles
IHC Magazine: April 2024 issue featuring Firms of the Year 2023 Results
As we round off the first quarter of this year, we are proud to showcase our IHC Firms of the Year for 2023. These firms have been selected by our IHC community in recognition of their invaluable contribution to their clients’ ...
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
A 'return' to private practice
Three experienced Asia-based lawyers spoke to Tim Gilkison about their 'return' to private practice, and how to make a successful transition ...
Physical security key to data centre protection
Controls that prevent physical access to servers must be a fundamental component of any information security programme ...
Self-Collection Risks
When digital evidence is required at the start of a matter, it’s easy to get swept up in the moment and start rushing to gather the evidence but this is a key time to step back, take a moment ...
Latest Articles