Malaysia

Financial Ombudsman Schemes are not novel in countries such as Australia, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and Singapore. On October 29, 2015, the Central Bank of Malaysia, or Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM), announced that the very first Financial Ombudsman Scheme is expected to operate in the first quarter of 2016.

Background
The Financial Ombudsman Scheme (the Scheme) was proposed by BNM as part of its efforts to enhance dispute resolution arrangements for financial consumers. The Scheme is an independent and alternate avenue for the resolution of disputes between financial consumers and financial service providers (FSPs) in respect of financial services or products.

The Scheme is approved by the BNM under the Financial Services Act 2013 as well as the Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 (the Acts). The Financial Services (Financial Ombudsman Scheme) Regulations 2015 and Islamic Financial Services (Financial Ombudsman Scheme) Regulations 2015, governing matters on the operation of the Scheme, came into force on September 14, 2015.

Structure
The Scheme, operated by a corporate body (the Operator), is funded by financial institutions who are members of the Scheme. The Scheme will be governed by a board of directors (the Board) made up of independent directors who are neither in active employment, nor have a significant interest in any member of the FSPs. The Chairman of the Board shall also be an independent director. The Operator is accountable to BNM.

Members of the Board, and officers of the Operator, including the ombudsman, who has access to any document or information relating to any of the dispute referred under the Scheme, shall have a duty of confidentiality, unless consent has been obtained from the eligible complainant or member FSP, or when such disclosure is required or permitted by law.

Eligible complainants

The Scheme may only consider disputes referred to it from eligible complainants, which consist of financial consumers, who use or have used the financial product or service, for personal, domestic, household or business purposes.

Eligible disputes

The Scheme may consider only disputes against member FSPs for direct financial loss, provided they are within the prescribed monetary limit, and which are not expressly excluded from the financial contract.

The prescribed monetary limits are as follows, namely:
(a) MYR250,000 for disputes on banking and insurance or takaful products or services;
(b) MYR10,000 for disputes on motor third party property damage; and
(c) MYR25,000 for disputes on unauthorised transactions involving payment instruments and payment channel, or cheque.

Disputes above the monetary limit of the Scheme may be considered, subject to the mutual agreement of both complainant and member FSP. However, the same dispute is not allowed to be lodged with the Tribunal for Consumer Claims.

The resolution process
An eligible complainant must first allow his complaint to go through the proper channels of the member FSP. If that fails, a case management aimed at facilitating the resolution of disputes through negotiation, mediation or conciliation will be held. In the event that both parties fail to reach an amicable agreement, a recommendation shall be made by the case manager. If that recommendation is rejected by any of the parties, such dispute will then proceed to be reviewed by an Ombudsman, who will then issue a final decision. The parties are free to pursue the matter through the courts if an amicable settlement cannot be achieved via the adjudication by the Ombudsman.

Awards
The Ombudsman may make or grant monetary awards against the member FSP, direct the member FSP to take certain steps for the resolution of dispute, order the reimbursement of costs and order interest payable under the monetary award. Member FSPs are under a statutory obligation to comply with the awards granted, failing which, may result in action taken by BNM for non-compliance.

Conclusion
The Scheme is indeed a significant step on the part of BNM in its efforts to protect financial consumers. It is hoped that the Scheme could boost the confidence of financial consumers towards the financial products and services offered by both the conventional and Islamic financial services industry in Malaysia.

––––––––––
ZUL RAFIQUE & partners
D3-3-8 Solaris Dutamas,
No 1 Jalan Dutamas 1
50480 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel: (60) 3 6209 8228
Fax: (60) 3 6209 8221
Email: knowledge@zulrafique.com.my
Website: www.zulrafique.com.my

Related Articles by Firm
Moral Rights … From peaks to pieces
MALAYSIA- Six years ago, the cultural and historical sculpture, Lunar Peaks or Puncak Purnama (‘the Sculpture’) made the national headlines when ...
Introducing the tort of sexual harassment
The Malaysian Federal Court in the case of Mohd Ridzwan bin Abdul Razak v Asmah binti Hj Mohd Nor recently delivered a landmark judgment ...
New Minimum Wages from July 2016
In Malaysia, the National Minimum Wages initiative (the Policy) was first introduced and announced by the Malaysian Prime Minister ...
Only Muslims may practise in Syariah courts
The Malaysian Federal Court in the case of Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan v Victoria Jayaseele Martin [2016] 1 LNS 131
Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement ... some highlights
The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (the TPPA) is a multilateral free trade agreement which aims to further liberalise the economies of ...
Budget 2016... Some highlights
Budget 2016 was first unveiled on October 23, 2015 by the Malaysian Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, Dato’ Sri Mohd ...
The Prevention of Terrorism Act 2015
The Prevention of Terrorism Act 2015 (the Act) came into force on September 1, 2015. The Act, which aims to prevent the conduct or ...
A new strata regime
Introduction The Strata Management Act 2013 (the Act) which came into force on June 1, 2015 repeals the Building and Common Property (Maintenance and Management) Act 2007. The implementation of the ...
Unfair dismissal…compensation, reinstatement, or neither?
The Malaysian Federal Court in the case of Unilever (M) Holdings Sdn Bhd v So Lai & Anor1 has issued a landmark ruling whereby it was held that an employee who had been wrongfully ...
The net effect
Netting arrangements refer to the settlement of obligations between two parties that processes the combined value of transactions. It is designed to lower the number of transactions ...
Taxing times ahead?
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) at the rate of 6 percent was introduced in Malaysia with effect from April 1, 2015. ...
What to expect when you are expecting…
The Court of Appeal, in the recent decision of Airasia Bhd v Rafizah Shima Mohamed Aris,1 ruled on the extent of which …
Amendments to the Malaysian Penal Code
After the withdrawal of two controversial clauses relating to the national flag and vandalism, the amendments made to the Malaysian Penal Code finally took effect …
Dismissal for unlawful picketing...too harsh?
In October 2014, the Federal Court of Malaysia, in Harianto Effendy Zakaria & Ors v Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia & Anor, [2014] 6 MLJ 305, upheld the dismissal of nine former bank employees by …
Prompt, punctual and paid (the Construction Industry Payment & Adjudication Act)
The construction industry, which has always been one of the more productive sectors, is constantly contributing to Malaysia’s economy. However, its fluctuating growth rates …
The Malaysian Credit Reporting Agencies Act comes into force
The Credit Reporting Agencies Act (CRA Act) came into force on January 15th, 2014. The Act provides for the registration and regulation of credit reporting agencies that are carrying on credit …
Landmark case on minimum wages in Malaysia… Does it include a service charge?
In June 2014, the Malaysian Industrial Court, in a landmark decision, ruled on the issue of a hotel employee’s salary structure. …
Deep impact... (on Malaysia’s bond market?)
The recent decision of the Malaysian Federal Court reported as CIMB Bank Bhd v Maybank Trustees Bhd & Other Appeals [2014] 3 CLJ 1 appeared to have changed the landscape of the bond market …
The liberalisation of legal services in Malaysia
After several years of dialogue, debate and deliberation, the amendments to the Malaysian Legal Profession Act 1976 have finally come into force, taking effect from June 3rd, 2014. The Legal Profession Act …
Related Articles
IHC Magazine: April 2024 issue featuring Firms of the Year 2023 Results
As we round off the first quarter of this year, we are proud to showcase our IHC Firms of the Year for 2023. These firms have been selected by our IHC community in recognition of their invaluable contribution to their clients’ ...
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
Process and issues in dual listing or cross listing of Malaysian-incorporated listed companies
Dual listing is when a company’s shares are listed on two or more different exchanges in addition to its domestic exchange for the purpose of adding liquidity to the shares and allowing investors greater choice in where they can ...
Deep impact... (on Malaysia’s bond market?)
The recent decision of the Malaysian Federal Court reported as CIMB Bank Bhd v Maybank Trustees Bhd & Other Appeals [2014] 3 CLJ 1 appeared to have changed the landscape of the bond market …
Latest Articles