Email: rkhurana@kroll.com
Website: www.kroll.com

v14i8_KrollWhile the political winds of the past 12 months seem to reflect an anti-globalisation sentiment in many major economies around the globe, it remains to be seen how this will impact the global flow of investment funds. Corporations tend to be opportunistic and Asian markets continue to present an arguably significant and growing investment opportunity, which is too large to ignore.

Strategic investors often choose to operate in emerging markets via joint ventures with local partners who control the operations of the local companies. Foreign investors in India, for example, often believe local partners are better able to manage India’s operating environment, where there is a close nexus between business, government and bureaucracy. These arrangements may create a perception to the foreign investors that there is something going on that is not visible.

While local businesses can often “see” behind the scenes, foreign investors struggle to do the same, especially in the due diligence phase, when the investor usually has limited access to the company’s financial information and management teams. In this case, it is not easy for a potential foreign investor to judge whether a suspicious transaction is potentially fraudulent or not. For example, local management may engage in related-party transactions to generate cash. However, it may be difficult for potential foreign investors to ascertain whether the cash is being generated for legitimate business purposes or for paying kickbacks to government officials.

It is similarly challenging for foreign investors to understand the performance of their local subsidiaries, joint venture partners and portfolio companies once the investment is complete. This may be because the foreign investor holds a minority position or because they do not control the management and operations of the local company. This leaves foreign investors with limited tools to monitor the performance of the local companies after investment.

Add to this the fact that regulatory oversight mechanisms in many emerging markets are still evolving and complex judicial systems often make it difficult for investors to enforce non-compliance with contractual rights and obligations. Tools available in developed markets — such as efficient courts and dispute resolution systems — cannot necessarily be relied upon in emerging markets to resolve disputes or recover investments in a timely manner, if at all.

As a result, it often becomes difficult for foreign investors to determine the true health of the target business and ethics of local partners. While on one hand foreign investors may end up making poor investment decisions and exposing themselves to regulatory risk, such as the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, on the other hand, foreign investors may also miss out on making good investment decisions due to insufficient or conflicting information from various due diligence providers on the ethics of the company. Investors may err on the side of caution and forego investment opportunities due to a lack of information.

However, it is possible to manage and ride these risks. The tips we give to both new and experienced foreign investors looking to invest in emerging markets, with regards to their concerns about fraud include:

  • Assess: A qualitative assessment of the operating environment and any potential partners, such as their reputation, political connections, ethical standards and business practices are as important as reviewing growth numbers, financial records and legal documents.
  • Understand: Foreign investors need to understand the full dynamics of the business and political environment in the country in which they are investing, to ensure that they make investments with a certain level of confidence. That is an art.
  • Prepare well: Investors should not be swayed by the competitive pressures of the investment environment in India, where often too many investors pursue the same opportunities. They should take their time so they are well-prepared and well-informed.
  • Never compromise: Investors should select advisers on a “no compromise basis” to ensure that they are truly independent and the integrity of any due diligence process is maintained.

Email: rkhurana@kroll.com
Website: www.kroll.com

[sharethis]
Tags: Due Diligence, Investigations
Related Articles by Firm
Statutory Registration of Standard Terms and Conditions in Tanzania
All companies doing business in Tanzania should know the salient points of the Standard Form (Consumer Contracts) Regulations 2014 which takes effect on 29 December 2015.
Tanzania Bill Establishing the Petroleum Act 2015
Tanzania's proposed Petroleum Act 2015 introduces key changes to the Petroleum Exploration and Production Act 1980 and the Petroleum Act 2008.
Clasis Law (India) Newsletter August 2015
Analysis of the revocation of a company's drug patent and other key court rulings and updates on corporate and commercial matters
Ship arrest in China - Increased clarity from the Supreme People's Court
The Supreme People's Court of the PRC published the Regulations for Certain Issues Concerning the Application of Law Relating to Arrest and Auction of Ships which took effect on March 1, 2015.
The new CIETAC Arbitration Rules 2015
The New Rules adopt both best practices and the latest developments in international commercial arbitration and accommodate the increasing needs of the parties arbitrating at CIETAC.
Related Articles
Projects & Energy Special Report: Thailand: New Minerals Act
A new Minerals Act (BE 2560 (2017) was published on March 2, 2017 and took effect on August 30, 2017 (180 days after the publication date) ...
Projects & Energy Special Report: Off-grid energy solutions in Africa
Africa’s development has been significantly affected by the energy deficit, with an estimated 70 percent of people in sub-Saharan Africa without reliable access to electricity ...
Projects & Energy Special Report: Indonesia – Power struggle
Recent years have been challenging for the power sector in Indonesia. Despite the government’s ambitious target to install 35,000MW of new capacity by 2019, the development of the electricity sector has not gone at the expected pace ...
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
Latest Articles
Benchmarking the in-house team’s evolution
Lawyers are increasingly expected to be much more actively involved in risk management, technology, strategy and project management.
Berwin Leighton Paisner and Bryan Cave in talks to merge
The two firms have confirmed they are in discussions about combining to create a new, fully integrated, global law firm ...
Links between environmental destruction and corruption risk in Southeast Asia
Corporate investigators need only work in corruption and fraud cases in Southeast Asia for a short while before noticing a correlation as clear as it is unsurprising ...