China (PRC)

BIAC logo 2017

W: www.bjac.org.cn

In March, the Beijing Arbitration Commission/Beijing International Arbitration Centre (BAC) and the Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration (NCIA) formally founded the China-Africa Joint Arbitration Centre – Beijing (CAJAC Beijing) and China-Africa Joint Arbitration Centre – Nairobi (CAJAC Nairobi).

The establishment of the CAJAC Beijing and the CAJAC Nairobi are important measures in building the Sino-African joint dispute resolution mechanism. Based on the platform of the CAJAC, the BAC and the NCIA will work together with each other and provide Chinese and African commercial entities with more qualified and efficient dispute resolution services, and thereby assist with the trade communication and economic development between China and African countries.

It is a cornerstone of China’s foreign policy to develop cooperation with African countries, and the establishment of the CAJAC is an inevitable requirement for upgrading Sino-African economic and trade cooperation, and a significant pillar for the promotion of Sino-African legal cooperation. It is hoped that CAJAC will lay a solid foundation and establish its own presence within the international arbitration community.

v14i9_BIAC_SR_SignUnder the background of the Belt and Road Initiative and the Africa Agenda 2063, the economic, trade and investment cooperation between China and Africa will deepen further, and it is therefore important to create a forum for the effective resolution of potential disputes and thereby to promote such cooperation. As a leading dispute resolution institution in Asia Pacific, the BAC has, with the coordination and guidance of the China Law Society, reached cooperation intention with the NCIA, and the establishment of the CAJAC will further strengthen the foundation of the Sino-African legal cooperation. The BAC will work closely with the NCIA to build the CAJAC-Beijing and the CAJAC-Nairobi into an arbitration institution providing qualified, efficient and professional dispute resolution services to commercial entities engaged in Sino-African trade and investment.

Since China and Kenya established diplomatic relations in 1963, Kenya has enjoyed increased trade year by year and frequent communication between Chinese and Kenyan people. Mombasa, as the second largest city of Kenya and a trade port, is a freight transfer station for overseas cargoes entering Africa, and thus is very important to the Sino-African economic and trade relationship. The NCIA is equipped with refined arbitration rules, as well as support from local authorities and trust from African enterprises, and therefore it looks forward to promoting the development of arbitration based on CAJAC in the future and providing Chinese and African clients with a reliable dispute resolution platform.

The inauguration ceremony in Beijing saw Lin Zhiwei, secretary general of the BAC, and Lawrence Muiruri Ngugi, chief executive of the NCIA, sign a cooperation agreement on the establishment of a Sino-African joint dispute resolution mechanism between Beijing Arbitration Commission/Beijing International Arbitration Centre and Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration on behalf of the BAC and the NCIA, respectively.

Zhang Mingqi, vice-chairman of the China Law Society; Gu Zhaomin, director of public relations for the China Law Society; Arthur Igeria, chair of the board of the NCIA; Xin Xiuming, vice-chairman of the China International Contractors Association; Huang Wen, deputy secretary general of the Shanghai International Arbitration Centre; and Michael Kuper, president of the Arbitration Foundation of Southern Africa, all witnessed the signing and inaugurating ceremony.

Ever since the presentation of the CAJAC idea in 2012, CAJAC-Johannesburg was founded in 2015 in coordination with the Arbitration Foundation of Southern Africa, with a goal of looking forward to uniting Chinese and African arbitration institutions and creating international dispute resolution rules to the benefit of developing countries. Sino-African legal cooperation is aimed at building a platform for exchange between the Chinese and African legal circles, and to promote
Sino-African cooperation and development, so as to contribute to the realisation of the Chinese dream.

As an important arbitration institution within Asia Pacific, the BAC has endeavored to provide clients with qualified dispute resolution services and to promote the development of the Chinese diversified dispute resolution industry. The establishment of the CAJAC-Beijing will create a larger platform for realising the prospect of building the BAC into a world-class diversified dispute resolution centre. The BAC welcomes colleagues from different circles to continue to pay attention to the diversified dispute resolution industry.

v14i9_BIAC_SR_2photo


For more Dispute Resolution Special Report in this issue

COVER_DespiteAsia gears up for international arbitration
Developments across the region are supporting the development of alternate dispute resolution mechanisms that will promote further investment into Asia’s …

 
v14i9_SQ_Katherine Yap350Q&A – Katherine Yap, chief executive of Maxwell Chambers
Singapore’s Maxwell Chambers is an integrated dispute resolution complex housing best-in-class hearing facilities and support services, as well as top international alternate dispute resolution (ADR) institutions. …

 

IMF_Tom Glasgow
Third-party funding in Asia
Asian-mena Counsel speaks to Tom Glasgow, investment manager for Asia at IMF Bentham, about the environment for third-party funding in the region…

 

The SCIA’s new rules make it the first arbitration institution in China to hear investor-state arbitrations and administer cases under Uncitral Arbitration Rules.
[sharethis]
Related Articles by Firm
Oil price volatility - global employment issues
Amidst the oil & gas layoffs, the industry has to ensure that it has the manpower skills in place to respond to demand when oil prices recover.
The Singapore approach to scrutiny of arbitral awards
International arbitration must, out of necessity, rely on the courts to uphold and enforce arbitral awards and to support the arbitral process...
The new CIETAC Arbitration Rules 2015
The New Rules adopt both best practices and the latest developments in international commercial arbitration and accommodate the increasing needs of the parties arbitrating at CIETAC.
Related Articles
Indonesia revisits online taxi issue
Indonesia’s previous attempt to regulate app-based online taxis, which came into force on October 1, 2016, clearly failed to resolve the tension with conventional taxi providers ...
Asia gears up for international arbitration
Developments across the region are supporting the development of alternate dispute resolution mechanisms that will promote further investment into Asia’s ...
Q&A - Katherine Yap, chief executive of Maxwell Chambers
Singapore’s Maxwell Chambers is an integrated dispute resolution complex housing best-in-class hearing facilities and support services, as well as top international alternate dispute resolution (ADR) institutions. ...
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
SAFE New Regulation Promotes Discretionary Settlement of FIEs’ Capital Nationwide
The State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) released a circular on Reforming the Administration of the Settlement of Foreign Exchange Capital of Foreign-invested Enterprises which further promotes discretionary settlement of foreign investment enterprises’ foreign exchange capital nationwide. The circular take ...
Latest Articles
Philippine Competition Commission Merger Review Guidelines
On 23 March 2017 the The Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) released the Merger Review Guidelines ...
Thailand: Ten year visa extension
Due to the rapidly increasing number of foreign senior-citizens seeking Thailand as a retirement destination, Thailand’s Cabinet recently approved the ten-year retirement visa extension ...
What should you do when a director gets arrested?
On December 6, 2016, Pacific Radiance Limited, a company listed on the mainboard of the Singapore Exchange announced that an executive director had been arrested by the Singaporean authorities on suspicion that he had committed an offense under the Prevention of Corruption ...