By Abraham Vergis, Asiyah Arif & Niki Chen
Third-party funding is increasingly prevalent globally in both litigation and arbitration. Prior to the legislative change in Singapore, many of the leading centres of international arbitration, e.g. New York, London, and Paris, had already permitted third-party funding.
Third-party funding involves the funding of a claim by a funder who has no connection to the dispute. Usually, the third-party funder will agree to finance some or all of the client’s legal fees in exchange for a share of the recovered damages.
In order to maintain and fortify Singapore’s prominence in international disputes, the Singapore Parliament passed the Civil Law (Amendment) Bill which amended the Civil Law Act (Cap 43) (“CLA”). This came into effect on 1 March 2017.
In the below PDF, Providence Law provides a brief overview of the key changes relating to third-party funding in Singapore.
, Dispute Resolution
, Third-party Funding
The Validity of Asymmetrical Arbitration Clauses
In the recent case of Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v Dyna-Jet Pte Ltd  2 SLR 362;  SGCA 32 (“Wilson”), the Court of Appeal was invited to consider the validity of an arbitration agreement that only provided for one party to commence ...
The “Good Faith” Principle
Hong Kong Court of Appeal holds that the “Good Faith” Principle is Complementary to the “Choice of Remedies” Principle, Aligning Hong Kong Law with Singapore Law ...
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
Ethical Decision Making Process by Manish Asarkar
Manish Asarkar, legal & compliance head of Black & Veatch, India talks about the value in having strong Ethics and Compliance for companies and how to reatain these values in the decision making process.