India

Clasis Law In-House Community India Legal Updates

14th Floor, Gopal Das Bhawan, 28, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi 110 001India
Tel: (91) 11 4213 0000 / Fax: (91) 11 4213 0099
Email: gaurav.wahie@clasislaw.com  •   prateek.sethi@clasislaw.com    Web: www.clasislaw.com

v14i8_Jur_indiaBackground to the joint venture: Tata DoCoMo, an Indian mobile network operator, was set up as a joint venture between Tata Teleservices (TTSL) and NTT DoCoMo in November 2008. DoCoMo was a minority shareholder (with a 26.5 percent stake, for which it paid approximately US$2.2 billion (Rs127.4 billion), a share price of Rs117 per share) in the company. The inter-se rights and obligations of the parties were set out in a shareholder agreement (SHA).

DoCoMo Exit: According to the SHA, DoCoMo had the right to sell its entire shareholding if the joint venture fails to achieve certain performance based milestones, with TTSL having the right of first refusal. On account of losses to the tune of US$1.3 billion, DoCoMo, in April 2014, announced its willingness to sell its entire shareholding in the joint venture to TTSL. As per the timeframes prescribed under the SHA for such an eventuality, Tata Sons had to find a buyer by December 2014, failing which it would compulsorily have to purchase DoCoMo’s stake in the joint venture.

Following Tata Sons inability to find a buyer, they sought the approval of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to purchase the shares from DoCoMo at Rs58.045 per share, in accordance with the terms of the SHA, for a valuation of US$1.1 billion. While referring to the then prevailing Foreign Exchange Management Regulations, the RBI rejected the deal in March 2015 and stated that the value of the put option should be based on the fair market value prevailing at the time it is exercised, and not a pre-determined valuation.

Following the rejection by RBI, TTSL offered to purchase DoCoMo’s stake at Rs23.24 per share on the basis of a fair market value determined by PricewaterhouseCoopers on June 30, 2014. DoCoMo rejected this offer and moved to the London Court of International Arbitration, which was the agreed dispute resolution mechanism, seeking a valuation of Rs58.045 per share.

It is pertinent to note that DoCoMo had also filed an enforcement application in the Delhi High Court, which the Tata Group challenged, notwithstanding that the full sum of the arbitral determination was deposited with the registrar of the Delhi High Court subject to final adjudication in the matter.

Settlement between the principals: With the intention to conclude, the parties approached the Delhi High Court on February 28, 2017 with a settlement plan. The Tata Group also released a statement that it would not challenge the enforceability of the foreign award in India, and DoCoMo agreed that it will not pursue Tata’s assets in the US and UK for the next six months.

Settlement: With the announcement of this settlement, RBI raised certain objections and approached the Delhi High Court and opposed the pact on the basis that it amounted to transfer of shares in a manner that was not permitted and that allowing this would set a wrong precedent.

The RBI was also concerned whether DoCoMo would pursue enforcement of the award in the US and the UK after six months in the eventuality that it doesn’t succeed in India. In this regard, the court objected to the concern raised by RBI and clarified that RBI cannot act on matters decided overseas.

Justice Murlidhar had then directed RBI to file a note or affidavit on the specific issues at the next hearing, which was fixed for March 14. On March 14, senior advocate Soli Sorabjee appeared on behalf of the RBI and sought the court’s allowance for the central bank to again look into the matter “afresh”, before clarifying its final position. On protests made by Kapil Sibal and Darius Khambata, appearing for DoCoMo and Tata Sons respectively, Justice Murlidhar while denying the senior counsel’s request allowed Sorabjee a further day to take instructions from the central bank, before making a final stand.

On March 15, the RBI did not address the court’s question on its jurisdiction over the international arbitration award. It was reported that Justice Murlidhar would decide whether RBI’s intervention application was maintainable and pass a judgment in a week (awaited at the time of writing this article).

 

Tags: India, joint venture, RBI
Related Articles by Firm
Corporate Social Responsibility
There is a growing realization among the corporates that business growth along with positive community/social impact is now an expected goal ...
India: Execution Proceedings for Enforcement of Arbitral Award
Recent Supreme Court judgement resolves certain issues and requirements ...
India: Impact of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017
With the assent of the President on January 3, 2018, the much-awaited Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 (Amendment Act), which provides for simpler provisions but stringent penalties, has finally seen the light of the day ...
Voluntary Liquidation in India
Winding up under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ...
Strike Off of Companies in India
Over the years, many companies have been lagging behind in filing of annual documents such as annual returns, financial statements etc ...
India: Valuation by Registered Valuer
“Price is what you pay, Value is what you get” ...
India: Amendments Under Master Directions on Issuance and Operation of Prepaid Payment by RBI
Digital wallets such as PayTM, along with debit and credit cards, are expected to reduce (if not completely replace) the use of paper currency …
India: Institutional Arbitration – Need of the Hour
The need to promote and encourage institutional arbitration for commercial disputes in India ...
India: Supreme Court settles the law: Major relief for foreign operational creditors
Clasis Law recently represented Macquarie Bank in two civil appeals before the Supreme Court of India ...
India: Consumer Protection
NCDRC’s ruling on ‘Voluntary Consumer Association’ under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ...
India: Foreign Exchange Management Regulation
Significant changes for transfer or issue of security to a person resident outside India ...
India: Directors' duties and liabilities under the Companies Act, 2013
Directors must be aware of their role, responsibilities and duties towards the company and its shareholders ...
India Update for December 2017
This edition brings to our readers a featured article titled “The Tourism and Hospitality Sector 2017 — The Year Gone By!!”
The tourism and hospitality sector 2017 — the year gone by
This year several policy decisions and judicial pronouncements affecting the tourism and hospitality sector were implemented. We have set out below some of the key developments and their effect on the sector ...
India: RBI issues Directions on Peer to Peer Lending Platform
Online lending transactions are in their nascent stage in India and given the increase in peer-to-peer (P2P) lending through e-commerce marketplace it is of extreme importance to regulate such transactions ...
INDIA: Right to privacy and data protection in India
The concept of data protection and privacy has not been addressed in any exclusive comprehensive legislation in India ...
India: Protection against groundless threats under Indian IP laws
Rapidly growing awareness of intellectual property (IP) rights and a well-structured statutory regime protecting IP has allowed rights owners to assert and enjoy the limited monopolies conferred on them ...
RBI granted powers to act on the resolution of stressed assets
By way of a circular dated May 5, 2017 (Circular), the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) amended the Framework for Revitalising Distressed Assets in the Economy ...
India Update for May 2017
The May 2017 India newsletter from Clasis Law includes an article on “Corporate Compliances: Necessity and Implication”, as well as Banking, Projects, Energy & Natural Resources and IP updates ...
Corporate compliance: Necessity and implication
The Companies Act of India is the primary legislation governing the functioning of companies established in India during their lifecycle....
India update from Clasis Law
Including briefings on the national food processing policy, projects and energy, and intellectual property.
Regulatory challenges for Vodafone Idea merger
Vodafone India is in discussions with Idea Cellular for an all-share merger. It appears that the intense competition the Indian telecom industry is facing due to freebies offered by the new entrant, Reliance Jio, has ...
India Update, inc: Regulatory challenges for Vodafone Idea merger
This months India newsletter from Clasis Law includes an article on the “Regulatory challenges for Vodafone Idea merger”, plus updates in Projects, Energy, IP and Banking & Finance ...
Investment conditions and restrictions for venture capital funds
Venture capital funds (VCFs) are contributing considerably to India’s economic growth. The amount of investment directed to venture capital has grown in recent years due to the pro-business environment and ...
India’s bid to become a hub for international commercial arbitration
As one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, India is a party to many international commercial arbitrations and the government is making efforts ...
Brands – Role and liability of celebrity endorsers
The marketing and advertising industry has grown as an organised industry using innovative ideas that are designed to ...
Related Articles
The new UAE Pledge Law
Promulgation of regulations that make registration available.
Exchange control laws of India: Compounding of contraventions
India has a complex exchange control regulatory mechanism that investors often find it difficult to comply with.
Corporate Social Responsibility
There is a growing realization among the corporates that business growth along with positive community/social impact is now an expected goal ...
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
India: Valuation by Registered Valuer
“Price is what you pay, Value is what you get” ...
New beginnings after India's largest law firm divides
Saturday May 9th 2015, was the last working day of Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A Shroff & Co...
Latest Articles
The new UAE Pledge Law
Promulgation of regulations that make registration available.
Exchange control laws of India: Compounding of contraventions
India has a complex exchange control regulatory mechanism that investors often find it difficult to comply with.
Corporate Social Responsibility
There is a growing realization among the corporates that business growth along with positive community/social impact is now an expected goal ...