Malaysia

Introduction
The Malaysian Federal Court in the case of Mohd Ridzwan bin Abdul Razak v Asmah binti Hj Mohd Nor1 recently delivered a landmark judgment, ruling that victims of sexual harassment will now be able to seek civil remedies under the tort of sexual harassment. This is the first case involving a sexual harassment victim at a workplace who sought remedy from the civil court. There was previously no avenue for a civil action for sexual harassment under Malaysian law.

The law
The law on sexual harassment is contained in a non-binding guideline, namely the Malaysian Code of Practice on the Prevention and Eradication of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace (the Code). In addition to the Code, a recent amendment to the Malaysian Employment Act 19552 merely imposed a duty on employers to adequately deal with sexual harassment complaints at their workplace.

The facts
The plaintiff and the defendant were employees of a company (the Company). The defendant reported directly to the plaintiff. In July 2009, the defendant lodged a complaint (the Complaint) to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company claiming sexual harassment by the plaintiff. An inquiry was conducted, and although there was insufficient evidence to warrant disciplinary action, a strong administrative reprimand was issued to the plaintiff. Aggrieved, the plaintiff, in December 2011 issued a writ against the defendant seeking, inter alia, a declaration that he had not sexually harassed her and that he had been defamed by the Complaint made by the defendant. The defendant filed her defence and also a counterclaim against the plaintiff. In her counterclaim, the defendant particularised the sexual harassment. The defendant also pleaded that her allegations were upheld by their employer and that a serious disciplinary warning was issued to the plaintiff pursuant to the Complaint. The defendant counterclaimed for damages predicated on sexual harassment. The High Court found that the plaintiff failed to prove his defamation claim against the defendant and allowed the defendant’s counterclaim. This was upheld by the Court of Appeal. Aggrieved, the plaintiff appealed to the Federal Court.

The issue
The main issue for consideration was whether the defendant had a valid cause of action in a civil claim on the grounds of sexual harassment.

The decision
In the High Court, the plaintiff’s claim was dismissed as he had failed to prove that the defendant had defamed him through the contents of the complaint letter. The defendant’s counterclaim, however, was allowed and she was awarded damages amounting to MYR120,000 since there was a direct link between her mental, physical and emotional pain and suffering, and the sexual harassment committed by the plaintiff. However, no clarification was made as to the pleaded tort of sexual harassment. The decision of the High Court was upheld by the Court of Appeal. It was further held that where acts of sexual harassment are serious to cause adverse psychological effect on the victim, those acts would fall within the tort of intentionally causing nervous shock. Therefore, since the plaintiff’s actions did amount to sexual harassment and that the plaintiff had knowledge of the defendant’s vulnerability which had adversely affected her, the plaintiff’s actions fell within the tort of intentionally causing nervous shock. On further appeal to the Federal Court, it was held that since the tort of sexual harassment was pleaded at the High Court, coupled with the fact that there was ample evidence to establish it, the introduction of the tort of harassment was justified.

Conclusion
The Federal Court decision proves to be significant as the recognition of the tort of sexual harassment provides an avenue for victims, both women working in the formal and informal working sector, to seek civil remedy, which goes beyond the remedies provided under the Code and the Malaysian Employment Act 1955.

–––––––
Endnote
1. [2016] MLJU 277
2. Employment (Amendment) Act 2012

––––––––––––
Zul Rafique & Partners
D3-3-8 Solaris Dutamas, No 1 Jalan Dutamas 1, 50480 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel: (60) 3 6209 8228 / Fax: (60) 3 6209 8221
E: look@zulrafique.com.my
W: www.zulrafique.com.my

Related Articles by Firm
Moral Rights … From peaks to pieces
MALAYSIA- Six years ago, the cultural and historical sculpture, Lunar Peaks or Puncak Purnama (‘the Sculpture’) made the national headlines when ...
New Minimum Wages from July 2016
In Malaysia, the National Minimum Wages initiative (the Policy) was first introduced and announced by the Malaysian Prime Minister ...
Only Muslims may practise in Syariah courts
The Malaysian Federal Court in the case of Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan v Victoria Jayaseele Martin [2016] 1 LNS 131
Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement ... some highlights
The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (the TPPA) is a multilateral free trade agreement which aims to further liberalise the economies of ...
Financial Ombudsman Scheme
Financial Ombudsman Schemes are not novel in countries such as Australia, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and Singapore. On October 29, 2015, the Central Bank of Malaysia...
Budget 2016... Some highlights
Budget 2016 was first unveiled on October 23, 2015 by the Malaysian Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, Dato’ Sri Mohd ...
The Prevention of Terrorism Act 2015
The Prevention of Terrorism Act 2015 (the Act) came into force on September 1, 2015. The Act, which aims to prevent the conduct or ...
A new strata regime
Introduction The Strata Management Act 2013 (the Act) which came into force on June 1, 2015 repeals the Building and Common Property (Maintenance and Management) Act 2007. The implementation of the ...
Unfair dismissal…compensation, reinstatement, or neither?
The Malaysian Federal Court in the case of Unilever (M) Holdings Sdn Bhd v So Lai & Anor1 has issued a landmark ruling whereby it was held that an employee who had been wrongfully ...
The net effect
Netting arrangements refer to the settlement of obligations between two parties that processes the combined value of transactions. It is designed to lower the number of transactions ...
Taxing times ahead?
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) at the rate of 6 percent was introduced in Malaysia with effect from April 1, 2015. ...
What to expect when you are expecting…
The Court of Appeal, in the recent decision of Airasia Bhd v Rafizah Shima Mohamed Aris,1 ruled on the extent of which …
Amendments to the Malaysian Penal Code
After the withdrawal of two controversial clauses relating to the national flag and vandalism, the amendments made to the Malaysian Penal Code finally took effect …
Dismissal for unlawful picketing...too harsh?
In October 2014, the Federal Court of Malaysia, in Harianto Effendy Zakaria & Ors v Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia & Anor, [2014] 6 MLJ 305, upheld the dismissal of nine former bank employees by …
Prompt, punctual and paid (the Construction Industry Payment & Adjudication Act)
The construction industry, which has always been one of the more productive sectors, is constantly contributing to Malaysia’s economy. However, its fluctuating growth rates …
The Malaysian Credit Reporting Agencies Act comes into force
The Credit Reporting Agencies Act (CRA Act) came into force on January 15th, 2014. The Act provides for the registration and regulation of credit reporting agencies that are carrying on credit …
Landmark case on minimum wages in Malaysia… Does it include a service charge?
In June 2014, the Malaysian Industrial Court, in a landmark decision, ruled on the issue of a hotel employee’s salary structure. …
Deep impact... (on Malaysia’s bond market?)
The recent decision of the Malaysian Federal Court reported as CIMB Bank Bhd v Maybank Trustees Bhd & Other Appeals [2014] 3 CLJ 1 appeared to have changed the landscape of the bond market …
The liberalisation of legal services in Malaysia
After several years of dialogue, debate and deliberation, the amendments to the Malaysian Legal Profession Act 1976 have finally come into force, taking effect from June 3rd, 2014. The Legal Profession Act …
Related Articles
Developments in competition law in Africa
At LEX Africa’s June seminar on developments in competition law in Africa, speakers discussed the increasing trend of governments to try and use competition law as an important part of their industrial policy ...
How the Mental Health Act affects employees
Mental health conditions, which include anxiety and panic disorders, depression, eating disorders, substance abuse and addictions, have become a pervasive issue which permeates our present society ...
Major amendments to the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secrets Protection Act
Following its amendment on April 17, 2018, the new provisions of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secrets Protection Act took effect on July 18, 2018 ...
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
The thing about … Nagarajah Muttiah
As we come close to the firm’s centenary, Asian-mena Counsel talks to the managing partner of Malaysia's Shook Lin & Bok ...
Conquering the divide
Thavakumar Kandiahpillai, General Counsel for the Shell Group of Companies in Malaysia discusses his transition from private practice to life as an in-house lawyer, and shares why Shell’s extensive recruitment process helps retain the cream ...
Latest Articles
Developments in competition law in Africa
At LEX Africa’s June seminar on developments in competition law in Africa, speakers discussed the increasing trend of governments to try and use competition law as an important part of their industrial policy ...
How the Mental Health Act affects employees
Mental health conditions, which include anxiety and panic disorders, depression, eating disorders, substance abuse and addictions, have become a pervasive issue which permeates our present society ...
Major amendments to the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secrets Protection Act
Following its amendment on April 17, 2018, the new provisions of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secrets Protection Act took effect on July 18, 2018 ...