Evangelos Apostolou of Major, Lindsey & Africa explains the arts of worldly wisdom and war.

 

The idea of using the first 100 days in a new role as a way to mark or evaluate success looks to have its origins in the first part of the 20th century in the American presidency of Franklin D Roosevelt. It does, though, appear that FDR had in mind to measure the progress of his New Deal in the first 100 days of a special congressional session that year, rather than his first 100 days in office. Be that as it may, for general counsel as much as for American presidents, the first 100 days has become a yardstick by which onlookers judge initial success or failure.

Getting agreement on a universal definition of a GC is notoriously difficult. The mantle of GC is as legitimately claimed by the sole lawyer of a small organisation as it is by the leader of an in-house team large enough to effectively compete with a sizeable external law firm. Some GCs see their role as naturally including, for example, company secretarial, compliance and data security matters, while others don’t. Some expect mostly to manage external counsel, others expect to do the work mostly themselves. Some will wait to be instructed in the traditional way of lawyers, others are so involved in the business of their organisations that it is difficult to spot the lawyer in a meeting with her business colleagues.

In The Art of Worldly Wisdom, the 17th century Spanish Jesuit priest Balthasar Gracian asserts that“there is more required nowadays to make a single wise man than formerly to make seven sages”.Whatever definition of a GC is favoured, this view of making one’s way in the world feels peculiarly true of the expectations that the GC carries into a new role. Being a trusted confidante who previously dispensed clear and relevant legal advice appears to have been firmly superseded by the requirement to simultaneously play an ever-increasing number of distinct parts: oracle, high strategist, technology seer, mistress of the archives, keeper of the public conscience, dread manager of spreadsheets, war party leader, executioner — to name a few of the better known ones.

Against this maelstrom of definitions and expectations, what then should the incoming GC address in the first 100 days?

Day zero
Before formally accepting the role, a would-be GC ought to clarify whether the position will have a seat at the table, be it as a member of the board, as part of an executive management team or asome other equivalent arrangement. If it is clear that no seat is available, then it is reasonable to pause and consider whether to accept the role at all. Taking up a role on the promise of a seat may sometimes work, but experience suggests that it seldom does.

Preparation ought to begin well before walking in the door on day one. If the appointment is an external one, then the probability is that a reasonable amount of investigation and diligence regarding the new organisation will have taken place during the hiring process. Thereafter, the effort to learn as much as is publicly available, or may fairly be disclosed upon request prior to joining, is no more than achieving starting-blocks status for day one.

A serious mistake, even for senior lawyers, is to get drawn into fighting the first fires they come across, only to re-emerge when it is too late to meaningfully make use of the opportunities that come with a new environment. If the appointment is an internal one, the bear trap for the new GC to avoid is to be so close to their existing environment that they do not see it for what it is. And in not seeing it, again miss the opportunity for useful change.

Day one
Once in the role, the timely anticipation of risk perhaps describes the highest point of a GC’s contribution to her organisation. There is significantly more value in the GC advising that a potential change in local market regulations will place existing revenues at risk than simply dealing with the effect of the regulatory change once it has already taken place. If at the same time the GC is able to indicate the possibility of new-wave revenues connected to the expected regulatory change, that arguably expresses the essence of being an effective in-house lawyer. Sun Tzu, in the 6th century BC Chinese work The Art of War, puts the point neatly:“To win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill; to subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.”

This fundamental attitude to success frames the core activity of the first 100 days. To be in a position to offer advice and insight that anticipates risk and not only deals with it once it has arisen, the GC must make a strong beginning to:

  • know the business of the organisation;
  • know the key personalities that manage and execute that business;
  • know the external considerations (regulators, competitors, geo-political developments, etc) that influence or affect her business environment; and
  • know the resources available to deliver her role.

Day 101
Having made meaningful progress in each of these areas by the end of the first 100 days, a GC should aim to communicate objectives for the legal team that are aligned to the organisation’s short-, medium- and long-term business plans and strategy. These objectives should be wrapped in simple and measurable key performance indicators, which should be easily understood and demonstrate value for money in relation to a blend of:

  • reducing or containing business risk;
  • increasing the quality of legal services; and
  • controlling, reducing or avoiding cost.

Beyond 100 days, and in the years that follow, the GC ought to work to cement the conditions in which the team:

  • is visibly connected to the organisation through its close management of key stakeholder relationships;
  • is able to demonstrate an informed and honest understanding of those continuously changing elements that the organisation cares most deeply about, including:
    • go-to-market priorities and strategy;
    • where revenue is to be defended and where it is to be grown; and
    • critical business risks.
  • is able to reasonably anticipate and plan for the cost-effective management of resourcing needs;
  • works effectively, as one integrated team across different jurisdictions and areas of specialist advice; and
  • has the opportunity to strive for a high degree of recognition — internally and externally — for providing legally compliant business solutions.

For most newly appointed GCs there is a honeymoon phase during the first weeks and months when those around them will generally be supportive and open to a degree of change simply because the GC is new to the role. At a time when being a GC is more challenging than it has ever been, the incoming GC is well advised to see that, as important as the first 100 days are, they are neither less nor more important than the ones that come before and after.

First 100 days: Before and after

  • Start preparing before you join:
    • As much as you can, find out what have been the major legal-related issues faced by the organisation. What have been the consequences? Where have they arisen and how, and by whom, have they been dealt with?
    • How is the legal team perceived?
    • How does the legal team communicate and explain its value to the organisation?
  • Where possible, identify a set of hit-the-ground-running projects that fall into the category of an achievable set of quick wins to be delivered by Day 99.
  • Make a meaningful start to becoming — and being known as — a subject-matter-expert in what your organisation does, and how it does it.
  • Systematically set about establishing and maintaining key stakeholder relationships that you haven’t already got underway, both internally and externally. Embark on the longer-term journey of identifying sources of institutional knowledge/organisational memory and locating where the skeletons are buried.
  • Evaluate your team, their experience, their ways of working and the resources you are inheriting. Understand in detail how the legal team is accounted for (including external counsel spend), where the budgets sit and who exercises approval for their use. Put in place short-, medium- and long-term plans to refresh and improve, as necessary.
  • Adopt the 4:1 rule in interacting with senior stakeholders, which is to say: use your eyes and ears in proportion to your mouth, so that you listen and see more than you speak. For those things that you are clear you want and need to say, set a style of communicating clearly and often.
  • Create a go-forward set of legal team priorities and deliverables to be communicated on Day 101 that align tightly with your organisation’s business plans and for which you have secured the support of your executive team/key stakeholders.

 

Evangelos Apostolou Judge Counsels of the Year 2018Evangelos Apostolou is head of Major, Lindsey & Africa’s EMEA and APAC in-house practice group, formerly general counsel, APAC, for Ernst & Young and general counsel, APAC, for British Telecom

eapostolou@mlaglobal.com     www.mlaglobal.com/

 


Evangelos will be running an exclusive GC workshop on the In-House Development Model in Abu Dhabi on November 22 (the day after the Abu Dhabi In-House Community Congress, 2018). For more information about this special session, please email Patrick Dransfield

Related Articles by Firm
Clasis Law (India) Newsletter August 2015
Analysis of the revocation of a company's drug patent and other key court rulings and updates on corporate and commercial matters
Foreign Banks Allowed to Operate in Myanmar
After more than 50 years of banning, the Central Bank of Myanmar has issued the first final licenses allowing four foreign banks to operate in Myanmar.
Tanzanian Draft National Energy Policy of 2015
Highlights on the ongoing and upcoming industry developments with focus on the transition of the energy sector since the introduction of the Big Results Now! campaign
Mineral Rights Available in Tanzania
Overview of the mineral rights available in Tanzania, with specific focus on the various categories of mineral rights
The Legal Framework of the Aviation Sector in Tanzania
As attention turns to Tanzania’s trade and energy opportunities, the spotlight has fallen upon the nation’s infrastructure. This update focuses on the capabilities and issues of the Tanzanian aviation sector.
Oil price volatility - Offshore oil storage
Are there any legal concerns with tankers being used for floating storage?
Oil price volatility - risks and opportunities in 2015
While many companies can weather the oil price slide and volatility, some industry players face a real risk of insolvency.
India: Union Budget 2015
A bullet-point overview of changes in Direct Tax, Indirect Tax and Goods and Service Tax in India in light of Finance Minister Arun Jaitley’s first full-year Budget…
Prohibition against transfer of personal data outside Hong Kong
Section 33 of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO) prohibits the transfer of personal data to places outside Hong Kong, except in circumstances specified in the PDPO.
Security of payment under FIDIC contracts: more secure, for now
The High Court of Singapore recently handed down an important judgment in relation to the enforceability of Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB) decisions under the FIDIC forms of contract.
Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill passed as Ordinance in India
The long-awaited Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill has become a provisional law in India. The Bill amends the Insurance Act (1938), the General Insurance Business (Naturalisation) Act (1972), and the Insurance Regulatory and Development Act (1999).
SICC: now open for business
On Monday 5 January 2015, the Singapore International Commercial Court ("SICC") was officially opened...
Myanmar insurance update
Clyde & Co partner Michael Horn recently visited Myanmar's commercial capital Yangon and reports on the current state of the insurance market...
Launch of the online mining cadastre transactional portal
Plus, a summary of the key mineral rights available in Tanzania; and, a look at the manner in which mineral rights can be transferred.
Restrictions imposed on holders of mineral rights
This briefing looks at some of the restrictions imposed on holders of mineral rights in Tanzania by the Mining Act 2010
Draft local content policy for the oil & gas industry in Tanzania
The first draft of the long-awaited local content policy for the oil & gas industry in Tanzania has now been published by the Ministry of Energy and Minerals ...
Tanzania: Revocation of mining licences
The Tanzanian government recently announced the cancellation of a total of 174 mining licences. This mining update examines the key continuing obligations imposed by the Mining Act upon mining licence holders.
Mining Development Agreements
In this month’s mining briefing we look at Mining Development Agreements (MDAs) and the role that they play in the mining sector in Tanzania.
The Tanzanian railway system: current legal framework
The railway system of mainland Tanzania has a total track length of 3,676 kilometers (km) with two separate networks, run by two separate organisations ...
Related Articles
The thing about … Sarah Grimmer
Ahead of Hong Kong Arbitration Week (Oct 29 to Nov 2), HKIAC secretary-general Sarah Grimmer talks about Belt and Road, Hong Kong as an arbitration centre and trends in the sector ...
The thing about … Paul Starr
King & Wood Mallesons’ Joint Worldwide Head of Arbitration and partner talks to Patrick Dransfield about Hong Kong, dispute resolution and working for China’s first international law firm.
Toward an innovative new strategy for In-House Counsel
An in-house legal team can achieve much more than saving money, but it requires a more strategic approach than most companies have adopted, writes Mitchell Kowalski, the Gowling WLG Visiting Professor in Legal Innovation at the University of Calgary Law ...
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
Latest Articles
Print Edition Subscription Form – Asian-mena Counsel
Asian-mena Counsel Print Edition Subscription Form
Creating an effective fintech IP strategy
Revised guidelines could provide opportunities to protect technology in this rapidly developing sector.
Significant precedents from the DIFC courts
Afridi & Angell successfully defended an anti-suit injunction, an application to exclude evidence and obtained a document production order.