Philippines

By Franchette M Acosta, senior partner, V&A Law

E: fm.acosta@thefirmva.com

The Philippine government has expanded anti-money laundering laws to include casinos, including internet and ship-based casinos. This is aligned with the Philippine government’s policy of preventing the country from being used as a money laundering and terrorist financing site. Casinos include internet casinos, or casinos in which persons participate by the use of remote communication facilities such as, but not limited to, internet, telephone, television, radio or any other kind of electronic or other technology for facilitating communication. Under the law, a single casino cash transaction involving an amount in excess of Five Million Pesos (P5,000,000.00) or its equivalent in any other currency is a covered transaction that must be reported. Casino cash transactions are transactions involving the receipt of cash by a casino paid by or on behalf of a customer; or transactions involving the payout of cash by a casino to a customer or to any person in his or her behalf.

To implement the inclusion of casinos under the coverage of the AMLA, the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC), Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR), Cagayan Economic Zone Authority (CEZA), and Aurora Pacific Economic Zone and Freeport Authority (APECO) jointly promulgated the implementing rules and regulations (IRR) of RA No. 10927 which took effect on 04 November 2017. The IRR mandates casinos to apply the following principles throughout their businesses: good corporate governance, know your customer rules and procedures, appropriate risk-management system and employee training. To comply with KYC obligations, casinos are also required to establish and record the true identity of their customers based on identification documents submitted upon opening of an account or redemption of casino chips or tokens or gaming instruments. For this purpose, appropriate systems and methods, and adequate internal controls shall be established for verifying and recording the true and full identity of customers. The IRR further provides that casinos shall conduct customer due diligence to ensure that they know their customers including the intermediary and the person or entity on whose behalf the transaction is being conducted. Thus, the IRR prohibits the opening of anonymous accounts and accounts under fictitious names, and the processing of withdrawal or transfer of funds from the account of the customer without conducting a face-to-face contact.

All customer due diligence records and casino transactions of customers must be maintained and safely stored for at least five (5) years. Casinos are required to report to the AMLC all covered transactions and suspicious transactions within five (5) working days, unless the AMLC prescribes a different period which shall not exceed fifteen (15) working days from the occurrence of the transaction. Thus, all casinos shall register with the AMLC’s electronic reporting system within ninety (90) days from the effectivity of the IRR.

Significantly, casinos are prohibited from engaging in any transaction involving the conversion of cash from one form to another without being used in gaming, and results therefrom, made through: the receipt of cash for transmittal of all or part thereof through wire or telegraphic transfer for or on behalf of a customer; payments in cash of funds received through wire or telegraphic transfer; and the cashing of checks or other negotiable instruments. Casinos are also prohibited from receiving cash if its purpose or ownership cannot be ascertained within a period of at least seven (7) days from the date of receipt, and from allowing the use of casino chips in the premises other than the issuing casino, including betting and exchanging into cash or other forms of casino chips.V&A Partner PhotoNN(300 dpi)

This is article is prepared for information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

http: www.thefirmva.com
Email: fm.acosta@thefirmva.com

Tags: AML, Gaming, The Philippines
Related Articles by Firm
Joint Venture Guidelines of the Philippine Reclamation Authority
The Guidelines govern all JVAs formed for the development and disposition of PRA’s existing properties and projects.
The Philippine Anti-Money Laundering Commission extends compliance requirement
Jewellery dealers, dealers in precious metals and dealers in precious stones are now deemed covered persons.
Updates on Data Privacy Law Compliance in the Philippines
Phase II Registration with National Privacy Commission ...
Philippines: Bureau of Internal Revenue Clarifies Taxes on Offshore Gaming
The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) issued Revenue Circular No. 102-2017 clarifying the tax imposed on entities engaged in Philippine offshore gaming operations ...
Law Passed Strengthening Consumer Protection in the Philippines
On December 19, 2017, the Gift Check Act of 2017 (Republic Act No. 10962) was signed into law ...
Philippine rules on merger procedure
The Philippine Competition Commission issued the Rules on Merger Procedure which explain the timing for the filing of a notice for covered transactions, the procedure for notification, Phase 1 and Phase 2 review and other matters, including confidentiality claims ...
Philippines: Timing for Notification under the PCC Rules on Merger Procedure
The Philippine Competition Commission published its Rules on Merger Procedure ...
Joint Venture Agreements with Philippine Local Government Units as Public-Private Partnership Modality
The Duterte Administration is poised to fund its aggressive infrastructure program internally and through official development assistance ...
Update on Data Privacy Law Compliance in the Philippines
Automated Decision-Making Operations, Institutions Likely to Pose Threats to Data Subjects and Phase 1 and Phase 2 of Registration with the NPC ...
Philippine Competition Commission Merger Review Guidelines
On 23 March 2017 the The Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) released the Merger Review Guidelines ...
Related Articles
Global Developments on Best Execution
Currently a hot topic for global regulators, firms are recommended to review their global best execution compliance practices ...
Initial Coin Offerings: Another brainteaser in the virtual currency bandwagon
The position of virtual currencies and ICOs in India remains murky.
The Singapore International Commercial Court considers the quantification of the Close-Out Amount under the ISDA Master Agreement
The decision provides clarification on how the Close-Out Amount under Clause 14 of the ISDA Master Agreement is to be calculated.
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
Law Passed Strengthening Consumer Protection in the Philippines
On December 19, 2017, the Gift Check Act of 2017 (Republic Act No. 10962) was signed into law ...
Philippine Competition Commission Merger Review Guidelines
On 23 March 2017 the The Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) released the Merger Review Guidelines ...
Anti-Trust & Competition: Philippines - Towards robust yet balanced competition in the Philippines
The state of Philippine competition regulation has been slowly taking shape barely over two years after the passage of the Philippine Competition Act (RA 10667) ...
Latest Articles
Taylor Root & Asian-mena Counsel Market Update and Salary Guide 2018
Asian-mena Counsel is delighted to partner with Taylor Root once again for their 12th annual report for the in-house legal and compliance sector ...
Global Developments on Best Execution
Currently a hot topic for global regulators, firms are recommended to review their global best execution compliance practices ...
Initial Coin Offerings: Another brainteaser in the virtual currency bandwagon
The position of virtual currencies and ICOs in India remains murky.