Singapore

Dispute resolution in Singapore is thriving more than everScreen Shot 2018-07-20 at 1.17.35 PM
According to the 2017 annual reports of the Singapore Supreme Court and Singapore International Arbitration Centre, over 13,822 applications were filed in the Singapore Supreme Court; an all-time high of 452 case filings and 421 cases were also administered in that year. Established in January 2015, the Singapore International Commercial Court has just turned three, and its caseload continues to increase with time. Collectively, the above institutions have heard some of the most high-profile cases, which include Sanum Investments v the Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic; Kingdom of Lesotho v Swissbourgh Diamond Mines (Pty) Ltd; and PNG Sustainable Development Program Limited v Independent State of Papua New Guinea. These cases show that Singapore’s efforts to be a premier dispute resolution centre are paying off, and this trend is likely to continue in the foreseeable future.

Why Singapore?
Parties choose to resolve their disputes in Singapore for a variety of reasons, but one of the most appealing is the relative ease of enforcement of awards and judgments obtained through the Singapore legal system. It bears repeating that Singapore’s rule of law is substantially stronger than that found in the surrounding countries. Many foreign investors have brought their neighbouring disputes to Singapore, even if the applicable law is that of the native country. This Screen Shot 2018-07-20 at 1.28.01 PMallows the plaintiff to have a dispute adjudicated in a neutral forum and enforce awards and judgments around the world if need be. This strategy works especially well when a defendant is a government, as trying to enforce local judgments against the government where the rule of law is weak can be fraught with all manner of difficulty, ranging from lack of jurisprudential sophistication to blatant political interference.

Increase of asset searches
In light of the above, it is clear that there are benefits to bringing disputes to Singapore. However, the process of enforcement requires one to not only think about where the dispute begins, but also where it ought to end. The reason for this is simple. Many parties who lose a dispute do not wish to pay and you have to compel them to do so through the legal process. This means that one often needs to conduct asset searches to ascertain a counterparty’s net worth in order to have some comfort that one can recover assets after a long-drawn legal battle. Some might say this is even more important than obtaining legal advice since an unenforceable paper judgment is of no use to anyone.

Not only is it prudent to conduct asset searches, it is also essential to know where such searches ought to be done. Money is fungible and can find its way to far-flung jurisdictions around the world, especially if a defendant is a fraudster seeking to conceal assets. Hence, one should build a global legal strategy around knowing where assets lie and where enforcement will take place. It is also important to have this strategy in place as early as possible (1) to prevent asset dissipation which invariably takes place soon after a dispute first arises and (2) to facilitate pre-dispute negotiations with a counterparty. These best practices apply in all jurisdictions, including disputes adjudicated in Singapore.

Screen Shot 2018-07-20 at 1.08.23 PM

 

By Kwek Chin Yong, Associate Managing Director, Kroll
E: chinyong.kwek@kroll.com
W: www.kroll.com

Related Articles by Firm
Innovating internal investigations in today’s hyperconnected world
Data visualisation tools have emerged as a powerful resource for internal investigations ...
New ultimate beneficial ownership disclosure requirements: An important step in combating financial crime in Indonesia
The requirement will strengthen and amplify the anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, anti-tax avoidance/evasion and anti-monopolism efforts.
Kroll: Opaque ownership fastest-growing concern for compliance professionals
Less than 25 percent feel highly confident in their program’s ability to address these risks.
Singapore gets serious in fight against bribery and corruption
Conducting joint investigations and joint enforcement actions with foreign authorities may become a new norm ...
Global Fraud & Risk Report – 2017/18
Forging New Paths in Times of Uncertainty ...
Law firms play a critical role in the new Indian Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code
Many new reforms and regulations have been introduced to support economic growth. However, one area that was always neglected was bankruptcy law ...
Risks for investors ahead of 2018 Malaysia elections
Investors should be aware of elevated fraud and corruption risks in the lead-up to the election ...
Forensic accounting to assist asset search
There are endless ways to identify assets, but it can be a costly exercise ...
Buyer, beware!
The final of four reports from Kroll and Liberty Asia on how to mitigate any hidden compliance and reputational risks relating to human trafficking issues …
Forewarned is forearmed
The third of four reports from Kroll and Liberty Asia on how to mitigate any hidden compliance and reputational risks relating to human trafficking issues …
Crime vs. Ethics: Changing corporate culture to reduce modern slavery
The second of four reports from Kroll and Liberty Asia on how to mitigate any hidden compliance and reputational risks relating to human trafficking issues …
Reducing and removing involvement in modern slavery
The first of four reports from Kroll and Liberty Asia on how to mitigate any hidden compliance and reputational risks relating to human trafficking issues ...
Related Articles
ADGM announces tech start-up licensing regime
The licence provides access to a Professional Services Support Programme aimed at allowing entrepreneurs entry to a community of businesses, financial services and professional advisers.
Further hurdles for regulatory approval of notifiable mergers in South Africa
On July 12, the Competition Amendment Bill was introduced in Parliament, substantially revising the earlier version of the Bill.
Lifting the veil on payments
Payments companies need to understand and comply with many complex laws and regulations.
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
Singapore: Recent Developments in Trade Mark Enforcement
In recent times, Singapore’s undisputed position as a global leader in shipping and intellectual property has come under substantial challenge ...
A SEA of change?
In this month’s cover feature, we look at trends in the role and composition of in-house teams across South-East Asia (SEA). In addition, Dr Le Net and Chau Huy Quang of AGZI LCT Law Firm provide an overview of ...
Latest Articles
ADGM announces tech start-up licensing regime
The licence provides access to a Professional Services Support Programme aimed at allowing entrepreneurs entry to a community of businesses, financial services and professional advisers.
Further hurdles for regulatory approval of notifiable mergers in South Africa
On July 12, the Competition Amendment Bill was introduced in Parliament, substantially revising the earlier version of the Bill.