Asia (Other)

Screen Shot 2017-11-16 at 5.08.41 pmAfter a period of rapid adoption of competition laws in Asia, only Bhutan and North Korea are compliance safe spaces, writes Nick Ferguson.

 

Doing business in Asia is getting increasingly complicated as jurisdictions have embraced competition laws and started active enforcement. This is good news for external advisers, but a potential compliance headache for in-house teams.

Even Hong Kong, which once prided itself as a bastion of free-market principles and laissez-faire regulation, has entered the enforcement phase of its new competition regime, with two proceedings launched so far this year — one against five technology companies accused of bid-rigging and another against 10 construction and engineering companies accused of price-fixing.

Enforcement activity is also on the rise in China, Japan and Korea. Indeed, China has quickly established itself as one of the most active jurisdictions in the world for competition law, with the commerce ministry handling 353 merger cases in 2016, which is even more than the EU. In Korea, the Fair Trade Commission imposed total fines of US$760 million in 2016 — almost double that of the US — and this year it imposed a US$900 million fine on Qualcomm.

“With competition regimes emerging and strengthening in Asia, companies doing business here will need to invest more resources to ensure compliance with the region’s diverse laws and enforcement practices,” according to Kaori Yamada, partner and co-head of Freshfields’ Asia antitrust, competition and trade practice. “Appropriate training, policies, procedures and internal reporting mechanisms can all mitigate the risk of infringement, but in-house legal teams need to keep these under constant review to keep pace with the region’s rapidly evolving landscape.”

Wherever companies do business in Asia today they are typically butting up against a competition environment that is either immature or undergoing significant amendments, and often both. China, Indonesia, Japan, Mongolia, Thailand and Vietnam are all either considering or actively overhauling their regimes, while countries such as Brunei, Laos, Myanmar and the Philippines all have relatively young competition laws that companies with global operations need to be aware of. And with Cambodia’s draft law close to being finalised, that leaves Bhutan and North Korea as the only jurisdictions in the region without some form of competition law.

Compared to the unified competition authorities in Europe and the US, the situation in Asia can be confusing and time-consuming. Qualcomm’s US$39 billion acquisition of NXP Semiconductor, for example, requires notification to merger control authorities in China, Japan, Korea, the Philippines and Taiwan.

i3-CBesides merger control, a particular focus for authorities in Asia is cartels. Almost every country in the region has a history of large groups dominating certain sectors of the economy, from the chaebol in Korea and the keiretsu in Japan, to the 40 or 50 families that control the economies of Hong Kong and South-East Asia. While these dynamics are changing, bid-rigging for government contracts remains a pervasive problem that costs the region billions of dollars a year, especially in developing economies where public procurement is typically higher as a share of GDP than in rich countries.

“This is a type of cartel that is a priority for many jurisdictions in Asia as it directly affects the public purse by making products more costly for the government and ultimately the taxpayers,” said Ruben Maximiano, a competition specialist at the OECD.

Hong Kong’s first bid-rigging case is scheduled to be heard by the Competition Tribunal in June 2018, while Korea has been particularly active in pursuing such cases recently, having imposed fines of W37.8 billion (US$34m) on four conveyor belt companies and penalised six concrete associations for collusion. Bid-rigging was also found in the power sector, with Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power both fined for anti-competitive practices.

Leniency programmes have proven surprisingly effective at obtaining evidence against cartels, particularly in Japan and Korea, but also in China, India, Singapore and Taiwan, according to Freshfields.

As competition authorities become more sophisticated and tackle more complex cases, enforcement powers have been increasing — and so has the confidence of the agencies charged with tackling anti-competitive behaviours and merger review, including thorny intellectual property issues in the digital economy, complex theories of harm and even issues arising from foreign-to-foreign M&A.

While there is some cause for concern given the rising protectionism seen around the world, specialists say they have yet not seen competition authorities in Asia using their powers to favour domestic players over foreign counterparts — and, in fact, foreign investment rules are actually being relaxed in several countries, such as China and Vietnam.

One thing is for sure — as the competition landscape in Asia continues to evolve, in-house legal teams will need to invest more resources into compliance.

“Undeniably, the centre of gravity of global competition law enforcement has shifted closer to Asia,” said Alastair Mordaunt, partner and co-head of Freshfields’ Asian antitrust, competition and trade practice. “While there are still huge variations across the region in terms of economic and political development, we are seeing Asian markets take a much more vigorous and sophisticated approach to competition law enforcement, and companies should take notice.”

Asian antitrust milestones
2017

  • New law comes into effect in Thailand
  • Enforcement begins in the Philippines
  • Merger control thresholds amended in India
  • Korea Fair Trade Commission fines Qualcomm approximately US$900m
  • Malaysia Competition Commission issues record fines in insurance sector
  • New sanctions come into effect in Mongolia
  • Hong Kong Competition Commission brings its first two cartel cases before the Competition Tribunal

2018

  • New competition law expected to be enacted in Vietnam
  • Draft text of changes to fining procedures expected to be introduced in Japan
  • Amendments to competition laws in Indonesia and Mongolia to be considered
  • Various rules on antitrust investigations and abuse of intellectual property rights to be considered in China

2019

  • Expected establishment of Asean Competition Enforcers’ Network
  • Philippine Competition Commission expected to complete its investigation into the cement industry

2020

  • New Asean Regional Guidelines for Competition Policy to be issued
  • Study on recommended procedures for joint investigations and decisions among Asean countries on cross-border cases to be completed
Source: Freshfields

E: nick.ferguson@inhousecommunity.com

[sharethis]
Tags: Anti-trust, Asia, Competition
Related Articles by Firm
Statutory Registration of Standard Terms and Conditions in Tanzania
All companies doing business in Tanzania should know the salient points of the Standard Form (Consumer Contracts) Regulations 2014 which takes effect on 29 December 2015.
Tanzania Bill Establishing the Petroleum Act 2015
Tanzania's proposed Petroleum Act 2015 introduces key changes to the Petroleum Exploration and Production Act 1980 and the Petroleum Act 2008.
Clasis Law (India) Newsletter August 2015
Analysis of the revocation of a company's drug patent and other key court rulings and updates on corporate and commercial matters
The new CIETAC Arbitration Rules 2015
The New Rules adopt both best practices and the latest developments in international commercial arbitration and accommodate the increasing needs of the parties arbitrating at CIETAC.
Tanzania: Prospecting for and mining of radioactive minerals
New uranium mining projects have recently been announced in Tanzania. This briefing looks at the legislative framework surrounding radioactive minerals in Tanzania.
Related Articles
Anti-Trust & Competition: China - Anti-monopoly enforcement in China’s healthcare industry
The healthcare industry has gradually become one of the key focal points of the anti-monopoly law enforcement in China ...
Anti-Trust & Competition: Philippines - Towards robust yet balanced competition in the Philippines
The state of Philippine competition regulation has been slowly taking shape barely over two years after the passage of the Philippine Competition Act (RA 10667) ...
Projects & Energy Special Report: Thailand: New Minerals Act
A new Minerals Act (BE 2560 (2017) was published on March 2, 2017 and took effect on August 30, 2017 (180 days after the publication date) ...
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
What should you do when a director gets arrested?
On December 6, 2016, Pacific Radiance Limited, a company listed on the mainboard of the Singapore Exchange announced that an executive director had been arrested by the Singaporean authorities on suspicion that he had committed an offense under the Prevention of Corruption ...
Cybersecurity a boardroom priority
“Nothing is certain but death, taxes and cyber-attack” - By Rory Macfarlane, Partner, Ince & Co Hong Kong ...
Asia in-house legal and compliance hiring trends and salaries, 2017
Asian-mena Counsel is delighted to partner again with Taylor Root on their 2017 market update and salary survey report for in-house legal and compliance in Hong Kong, China and Singapore ...
Latest Articles
ZICO celebrates 30 years with charitable donation
Yokuk provides therapy and welfare services as well as educational support for children and adults suffering from various disabilities ...
Crime vs. Ethics: Changing corporate culture to reduce modern slavery
The second of four reports from Kroll and Liberty Asia on how to mitigate any hidden compliance and reputational risks relating to human trafficking issues …
The Assistant Registrar’s Role in the Judicial Hierarchy
The decision in Peter Low LLC provides the latest judicial pronouncement on the role and position of an Assistant Registrar in the judicial hierarchy ...